MRS measurements and inversion in presence of EM noise

被引:0
|
作者
Legchenko, A. [1 ]
机构
[1] IRD LTHE, F-38041 Grenoble 9, France
来源
BOLETIN GEOLOGICO Y MINERO | 2007年 / 118卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The Magnetic Resonance Sounding method (MRS) is based on the resonance behavior of proton magnetic moments in the geomagnetic field. As the signal generated by the protons is very small, the method is sensitive to electromagnetic noise and this is one of the major limitations for practical application. The frequency of the magnetic resonance signal is directly proportional to the magnitude of the geomagnetic field, and varies between 800 Hz and 2800 Hz around the globe. Whilst natural noise within this frequency range is generally not very large (excepting magnetic storms or other temporary disturbances), the level of cultural noise (electrical power-lines, generators, etc.) may be very high. Both the depth of investigation and resolution of the MRS method depend on signal to noise ratio. If measured data are corrupted by noise, it will have an effect on the accuracy and reliability of MRS results. Consequently, the MRS signal has to be measured with an acceptable signal to noise ratio. For improving the signal to noise ratio different filtering techniques could be applied. Selection of the filtering scheme depends on the noise origin. In any case, application of the stacking is necessary. A large number of repetitive measurements are often required for stacking and consequently one sounding may take from one to twelve hours. In this paper, efficiency of different filtering techniques, inversion strategy and influence of non-filtering noise on MRS results are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:489 / 507
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Improvement in MRS parameter estimation by joint and laterally constrained inversion of MRS and TEM data
    Behroozmand, Ahmad A.
    Auken, Esben
    Fiandaca, Gianluca
    Christiansen, Anders Vest
    GEOPHYSICS, 2012, 77 (04) : WB191 - WB200
  • [32] The Doubling-Diameter Method for Detecting the Presence of Rig Noise in Jet-Noise Measurements
    Karon, Aharon Z.
    Ahuja, Krishan K.
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2023, 61 (10) : 4598 - 4609
  • [33] MRS PAUL ON AIRCRAFT NOISE - CORRECTION
    WALTERS, AA
    OXFORD ECONOMIC PAPERS-NEW SERIES, 1972, 24 (03): : 287 - 288
  • [34] Simulation of Laser Profilometer Measurements in the Presence of Speckle Using Perlin Noise
    Roos-Hoefgeest, Sara
    Roos-Hoefgeest, Mario
    Alvarez, Ignacio
    Gonzalez, Rafael C.
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (17)
  • [35] OPTIMUM FILTERS FOR CHARGE MEASUREMENTS IN THE PRESENCE OF 1/F CURRENT NOISE
    GERACI, A
    GATTI, E
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1995, 361 (1-2): : 277 - 289
  • [36] OPTIMUM FILTERS FOR DETECTOR CHARGE MEASUREMENTS IN PRESENCE OF 1/F NOISE
    GATTI, E
    SAMPIETRO, M
    MANFREDI, PF
    NUCLEAR INSTRUMENTS & METHODS IN PHYSICS RESEARCH SECTION A-ACCELERATORS SPECTROMETERS DETECTORS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT, 1990, 287 (03): : 513 - 520
  • [37] Noise measurements in the presence of large signal transients and studies of recovery effects
    Martens, J.
    2023 100TH ARFTG MICROWAVE MEASUREMENT CONFERENCE, ARFTG, 2023,
  • [38] Scalar Matching Indexes for Broadband EM Noise Source Determination With One-Port Measurements
    Paoletti, Umberto
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2022, 64 (03) : 613 - 622
  • [39] Joint inversion of aquifer test, MRS, and TEM data
    Vilhelmsen, Troels N.
    Behroozmand, Ahmad A.
    Christensen, Steen
    Nielsen, Toke H.
    WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2014, 50 (05) : 3956 - 3975
  • [40] New stochastic AGLID EM modeling and inversion
    Li, J.
    Xie, G.
    Xie, L.
    Xie, F.
    PIERS 2006 Cambridge: Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Proceedings, 2006, : 490 - 494