Specialized Public High Schools of Science, Mathematics, and Technology and the STEM Pipeline: What Do We Know Now and What Will We Know in 5 Years?

被引:32
|
作者
Subotnik, Rena [1 ]
Tai, Robert [3 ]
Rickoff, Rochelle [2 ]
Almarode, John [4 ]
机构
[1] Amer Psychol Assoc, Ctr Gifted Educ Policy, Washington, DC 20002 USA
[2] APA, CPSE, 750 First St,NE, Washington, DC 20002 USA
[3] Univ Virginia, Curry Sch Educ, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[4] Univ Virginia Sci Educ, Charlottesville, VA USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
STEM pipeline; STEM majors; interest and persistence in STEM; talent development; achievement motivation; short-term and long-term program evaluation; cultural values;
D O I
10.1080/02783190903386553
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Specialized public high schools of science, mathematics, and technology are commonly viewed as the "crown jewel" of their respective school districts and, many times, of their respective states. These schools are intended to coalesce the most academically talented, science-focused students in each district or state and typically draw excellent teachers as well. As the nation considers policies to address Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education issues, options for additional functions are likely to arise. Currently no existing studies provide a comprehensive analysis of the contribution these schools make over and above regular high schools to the STEM pipeline. This article presents the extant literature on variables that have been shown to predict participation in STEM careers on the part of adolescents in and out of specialized high schools. The literature review is followed by a description of a recently embarked 3-year National Science Foundation (NSF)-sponsored study designed to answer the following questions: Are specialized STEM high-school graduates more likely to remain in the STEM pipeline than students with similar achievement and interests who attended regular public high schools? Which educational/instructional practices used by specialized STEM high schools are associated with higher STEM pipeline retention rates in college and higher rates of entrance into STEM-related professions?
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 16
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NOW THAT WE KNOW YOUTH, WHAT WILL WE DO ABOUT IT
    ESTY, JC
    PHI DELTA KAPPAN, 1976, 57 (06) : 418 - 419
  • [22] Chronic prostatitis: what we know, what we do not know, and what we should do!
    Lobel, B
    Rodriguez, A
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 21 (02) : 57 - 63
  • [23] Chronic prostatitis: what we know, what we do not know, and what we should do!
    B. Lobel
    A. Rodriguez
    World Journal of Urology, 2003, 21 : 57 - 63
  • [24] Genetic platforms: Do we do what we know? or do we know what we do?
    Bernet, Laia
    Pla, Maria Jesus
    Janez, Noelia Martinez
    REVISTA DE SENOLOGIA Y PATOLOGIA MAMARIA, 2021, 34 (02): : 100 - 110
  • [25] We (Now) Know What We Are, But Not What We May Be
    Taner, Timucin
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (10) : 1978 - 1979
  • [26] Hydrocephalus and mucopolysaccharidoses: what do we know and what do we not know?
    Amauri Dalla Corte
    Carolina F. M. de Souza
    Maurício Anés
    Roberto Giugliani
    Child's Nervous System, 2017, 33 : 1073 - 1080
  • [27] Hydrocephalus and mucopolysaccharidoses: what do we know and what do we not know?
    Dalla Corte, Amauri
    de Souza, Carolina F. M.
    Anes, Mauricio
    Giugliani, Roberto
    CHILDS NERVOUS SYSTEM, 2017, 33 (07) : 1073 - 1080
  • [28] What do we know and what do we know about evolution?
    Vlchev, Boris
    SPISANIE NA B LGARSKOTO GEOLOGICHESKO DRUZHESTOV-REVIEW OF THE BULGARIAN GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 81 : 101 - 101
  • [29] Erratum to: What do we know? What do we need to know?
    Milena J. Henzlova
    W. Lane Duvall
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2017, 24 (1) : 255 - 255
  • [30] Presbyopia: What We Do Know and What We Do Not Know in 2022
    Grzybowski, Andrzej
    Gawecki, Maciej
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (03)