EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT HERBICIDES AND RATES OF APPLICATION EFFECTIVENESS ON WEED CONTROL IN MAIZE

被引:0
|
作者
Al-Chalabi, Faik T. [1 ]
Al-Fandawi, Suhad Mathcoor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Baghdad, Coll Agr, Baghdad, Iraq
来源
IRAQI JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES | 2010年 / 41卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Two field experiments were conducted with three replicates according to RCBD at the experimental field of Dept. of Field Crop Sciences - College of Agriculture - University of Baghdad during fall and spring seasons of 2001 to evaluate the effectiveness of herbicides; Imazamox, Atrazine, Bentazine, Isoxafutol, Propaquizefop and Clomayone; and their application rates on maize.The results showed that Atrazine (H69 and H68) at 3.2 kg.ha(-1), after 60 days, was significantly superior to other herbicides by giving less weed population during spring and fall seasons (2.5 and 1.7 plant.m(-2) respectively), while control treatment gave the highest average (16.2 and 11.8 plant.m(-2) respectively). Thus in comparion with control, number of weed were reduced by 84.5% and 85.5% respectively. Using 0.192 kg.h(-1) of Clomazon during spring season gave less average of weed number (3.4 plant.m(-2)) after 90 days, whereas the control gave higher average (25.1 plant.m(-2)), thus the weeds population were reduced by 86.46% in comparion with control. Herbicide behavior was different during fall season. Atrazine (H68) at 3.2 kg.ha(-1) gave less weed population (2.9 plant. m-(2)) while the weed population of the control was 19.9 plant.m(-2), so the weed population was reduced by 85.4. At harvest time, Isoxfotol at 105 kg. ha(-1) resulted in less weed population (17.8 plant.m(-2)), while Atrazine at 2.4 kg.ha(-1) resulted in less weed population during fall season (9.6 plant.m(-2)). From the results above, it was conclude that there were many differences in herbicide behavior in the percentage of weed number reduction after 60 and 90 days and at harvest time. These results confirm declining effectiveness of herbicide 90 days after sowing.
引用
收藏
页码:25 / +
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATION OF HERBICIDES FOR WEED-CONTROL IN SUGARBEETS IN MANITOBA
    KLASSEN, M
    GUCCIONE, G
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF SUGAR BEET TECHNOLOGISTS, 1971, 16 (07): : 552 - 560
  • [22] Evaluation of flumioxazin and other herbicides for weed control in gladiolus
    Richardson, Robert J.
    Zandstra, Bernard H.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 20 (02) : 394 - 398
  • [23] Evaluation of herbicides for selective weed control in grafted watermelons
    Cohen, R.
    Eizenberg, H.
    Edelstien, A.
    Horev, C.
    Lande, T.
    Porat, A.
    Achdari, G.
    Hershenhorn, J.
    PHYTOPARASITICA, 2008, 36 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [24] Evaluation of herbicides for weed control in chicory (Cichorium intybus)
    Wilson, RG
    Smith, JA
    Yonts, CD
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) : 540 - 544
  • [25] Dicamba: Dynamics in Straw (Maize) and Weed Control Effectiveness
    Mundt, Tamara Thais
    Gomes, Giovanna Larissa Gimenes Cotrick
    Picoli Junior, Gilmar Jose
    Ovejero, Ramiro Fernando Lopez
    Velini, Edivaldo Domingues
    Carbonari, Caio Antonio
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (10):
  • [26] Weed control with reduced rates of four soil applied soybean herbicides
    Muyonga, KC
    Defelice, MS
    Sims, BD
    WEED SCIENCE, 1996, 44 (01) : 148 - 155
  • [28] Evaluation of pre- and post-emergence herbicides for weed control in maize (Zea mays L.)
    Mehmeti, Arben
    Fetahaj, Rozafa
    Demaj, Adem
    Nishori, Filloreta
    Rracaj, Visar
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2019, 20 (01): : 208 - 221
  • [29] Evaluation of Herbicides for Chemical Weed Control in Lily Bulb Production
    Marinangeli, Pablo
    Lopez Castro, Ramon
    Facchinetti, Cecilia
    Reinoso, Lucio
    Irigoyen, Jorge
    Curvetto, Nestor
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 24 (04) : 483 - 488
  • [30] EVALUATION OF VARIOUS HERBICIDES AND THEIR COMBINATIONS FOR WEED CONTROL IN WHEAT CROP
    Hussain, Zahid
    Marwat, Khan Bahadar
    Munsif, Fazal
    Samad, Abdul
    Ali, Kawsar
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2013, 45 (01) : 55 - 59