Pharmacology and Toxicology of the Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists

被引:5
|
作者
Lovett, C. [1 ,2 ]
Wood, D. M. [1 ,3 ]
Dargan, P. I. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guys & St Thomas NHS Fdn Trust & Kings Hlth Partn, Clin Toxicol, London, England
[2] John Hunter Hosp, Emergency Med, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
[3] Kings Coll London, Fac Life Sci & Med, London, England
来源
REANIMATION | 2015年 / 24卷 / 05期
关键词
Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists; Spice; Acute toxicity; Psychosis;
D O I
10.1007/s13546-015-1104-4
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists (SCRAs) are a large group of new psychoactive substances (NPS) that have emerged over the last 5-10 years. There have been 134 SCRAs reported in Europe which makes them the largest group amongst the NPS. SCRAs are active at the cannabinoid receptors and most are very potent CB1 receptor agonists. They are generally sold in smoking mixtures but are also available in incenses and in powder form. This article discusses the numerous reports of acute toxicity related to the use of SCRA products. In summary, these reports suggest that in addition to cannabis like neuropsychiatric effects the SCRAs are also associated with stimulant features (e.g., agitation, tachycardia, hypertension, seizures) and there are reports of SCRA-related ischaemic stroke, acute coronary syndrome, and acute kidney injury.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 541
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Medicinal Chemistry, Pharmacology, and Potential Therapeutic Benefits of Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor Agonists
    Tabrizi, Mojgan Aghazadeh
    Baraldi, Pier Giovanni
    Borea, Pier Andrea
    Varani, Katia
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2016, 116 (02) : 519 - 560
  • [42] Pharmacology of Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists and a Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor in Rat Bone Tumor Pain
    Cui, Jin Hua
    Ju, Jin
    Yoon, Myung Ha
    PHARMACOLOGY, 2013, 92 (3-4) : 150 - 157
  • [43] DANGERS OF BANNING SPICE AND THE SYNTHETIC CANNABINOID AGONISTS
    Hammersley, Richard
    ADDICTION, 2010, 105 (02) : 373 - 373
  • [44] Comparing the effects of endogenous and synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists on survival of gastric cancer cells
    Ortega, A.
    Garcia-Hernandez, V. M.
    Ruiz-Garcia, E.
    Meneses-Garcia, A.
    Herrera-Gomez, A.
    Aguilar-Ponce, J. L.
    Montes-Servin, E.
    Prospero-Garcia, O.
    Del Angel, S. A.
    LIFE SCIENCES, 2016, 165 : 56 - 62
  • [45] Differential activation of G protein-mediated signaling by synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists
    Sachdev, Shivani
    Banister, Samuel D.
    Santiago, Marina
    Bladen, Chris
    Kassiou, Michael
    Connor, Mark
    PHARMACOLOGY RESEARCH & PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 8 (02):
  • [46] Synthesis and Functional Evaluation of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists Related to ADB-HEXINACA
    Sparkes, Eric
    Timmerman, Axelle
    Markham, Jack W.
    Boyd, Rochelle
    Gordon, Rebecca
    Walker, Katelyn A.
    Kevin, Richard C.
    Hibbs, David E.
    Banister, Samuel D.
    Cairns, Elizabeth A.
    Stove, Christophe
    Ametovski, Adam
    ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 15 (09): : 1787 - 1812
  • [47] Forensic patients' experiences of Synthetic Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists (SCRAs) within custodial settings
    Rogers, Gemma
    Rees, Jessica
    Rowe, Sarah
    Tyler, Nichola
    Tracy, Derek K.
    JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01): : 152 - 171
  • [48] Increase in Emergency Department presentations in Europe related to the use of synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists
    Wood, David M.
    Dines, Alison M.
    Hovda, Knut Erik
    Heyerdahl, Fridtjof
    Yates, Christopher
    Giraudon, Isabelle
    Dargan, Paul I.
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2017, 55 (05) : 447 - 448
  • [49] Toxicology and pharmacology of synthetic organoselenium compounds: an update
    Nogueira, Cristina W.
    Barbosa, Nilda V.
    Rocha, Joao B. T.
    ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 95 (04) : 1179 - 1226
  • [50] Latest advances in cannabinoid receptor agonists
    Thakur, Ganesh A.
    Tichkule, Ritesh
    Bajaj, Shama
    Makriyannis, Alexandros
    EXPERT OPINION ON THERAPEUTIC PATENTS, 2009, 19 (12) : 1647 - 1673