Antihypertensive Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Ramipril in Elderly Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension Grouped According to Renal Function Status A Retrospective Analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Malacco, Ettore [1 ]
Omboni, Stefano [2 ]
Mallion, Jean-Michel [3 ]
Volpe, Massimo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milan, Dept Internal Med, Osped L Sacco, Milan, Italy
[2] Italian Inst Telemed, Varese, Italy
[3] CHU Grenoble, Cardiol & Arterial Hypertens, Grenoble, France
[4] Univ Roma La Sapienza, St Andrea Hosp, Div Cardiol, Fac Med 2, Rome, Italy
[5] IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy
关键词
essential hypertension; elderly; olmesartan; ramipril; kidney disease; renal function; creatinine clearance;
D O I
10.1007/BF03297633
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Aim: The objective of this study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of the angiotensin 11 antagonist olmesartan medoxomil and the ACE inhibitor ramipril in elderly patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, grouped according to renal function. Methods: We performed a post hoe analysis of pooled data from two randomized, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre studies. After a 2-week placebo wash-out period, 1453 mild to moderate hypertensive subjects were randomized to a 12-week treatment with olmesartan medoxomil 10 mg/day or ramipril 2.5 mg/day. After 2 and 6 weeks, doses were increased up to a maximum of 40 mg/day (olmesartan medoxomil) and 10 mg/day (ramipril) in non-normalized subjects (office systolic blood pressure [SBP] >= 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >= 90 mmHg in non-diabetic subjects and office SBP >= 130 mmHg or DBP >= 80 mmHg in diabetic patients). Office blood pressure (BP) was measured at 0, 2, 6 and 12 weeks, 24-hour ambulatory BP at 0 and 12 weeks. 284 patients treated with olmesartan medoxomil 40 mg/day at the end of the double-blind period entered a 36-week, open-label follow-up. Renal function (Cockroft-Gault equation) was evaluated as normal or increased estimated glomendar filtration rate (eGFR)[>= 90 mL/min/1 73 m(2)], mild eGFR reduction (60-90 mUmin/1.73 m(2)) and moderate or severe eGFR reduction (<60 mUmin/1.73 m(2)). Results: 181 (12.7%) subjects had normal or increased eGFR, 840 (58.9%) mild eGFR reduction, and 405 (28.4%) moderate or severe eGFR reduction. Baseline-adjusted office BP reductions were superior with olmesartan medoxomil than with ramipril in normal or increased (olmesartan medoxomil ramipril difference SBP: 5.0 mmHg [95% Cl 9.1, 0.9], p = 0.018; DBP: 2.7 mmHg [4.8, 0.6], p=0.011) and mildly reduced eGFR patients (SBP: 1.6 mmHg [3.5, 0.2], p = 0.080; DBP: 1.2 mmHg [2.3, 0.2], p = 0.022). In the group with moderately or severely reduced eGFR the two treatments were comparable (SBP: 1.9 mmHg [4.6, 0.9], p = 0.185; DBP: 0.8 mmHg [2.3, +0.7]; p = 0.296). At 12 weeks, the rate of normalized patients was 46.1% with olmesartan medoxomil versus 23.9% with ramipril (p = 0.002) in the normal, and 49.9% versus 42.7% (p = 0.037) in the mild eGFR reduction group. No significant differences in normalization rate were observed in the moderately or severely reduced eGFR group (olmesartan medoxomil 49.5% vs ramipril 46.3%, p = 0.519). eGFR did not show any significant change during treatment. Conclusions: Olmesartan medoxomil provides a more effective BP control, similar if not superior to that of ramipril, independently from the patient's renal function status.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 222
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] META-ANALYSIS OF OLMESARTAN MEDOXOMIL MONOTHERAPY IN REDUCING BLOOD PRESSURE IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION
    Redon, J.
    Weber, M. A.
    Wang, J. G.
    Chavanu, K.
    Maa, J.
    Reimitz, P.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2015, 33 : E190 - E190
  • [32] Blood pressure goal achievement rates with olmesartan medoxomil-based treatment regimens in patients with mild to moderate hypertension
    Barrios, V.
    Calderon, A.
    Escobar, C.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2008, 26 : S471 - S471
  • [33] ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY OF GUANFACINE AND METHYLDOPA IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    WILSON, MF
    BLACKSHEAR, J
    PARSONS, OA
    LOVALLO, WR
    MATHUR, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 31 (04): : 318 - 326
  • [34] ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY OF GUANFACINE AND PRAZOSIN IN PATIENTS WITH MILD TO MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    LEWIN, A
    ALDERMAN, MH
    MATHUR, P
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 30 (12): : 1081 - 1087
  • [35] Olmesartan Medoxomil in Elderly Patients with Essential or Isolated Systolic Hypertension Efficacy and Safety Data from Clinical Trials
    Heagerty, Anthony M.
    Mallion, Jean-Michel
    DRUGS & AGING, 2009, 26 (01) : 61 - 76
  • [36] Evaluation of 24-hour antihypertensive effect of ramipril (Polpril) in patients with essential mild/moderate arterial hypertension
    Kostka-Jeziorny, Katarzyna
    Lipski, Dawid
    Uruski, Pawel
    Gorczyca-Michta, Iwona
    Lopatka, Pawel
    Wozakowska-Kaplon, Beata
    Tykarski, Andrzej
    ARTERIAL HYPERTENSION, 2012, 16 (05): : 288 - 295
  • [37] ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY OF LOW-DOSAGE ANGIOTENSIN CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITION IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH MILD OR MODERATE HYPERTENSION
    MARIGLIANO, V
    CACCIAFESTA, M
    FERRI, C
    PICCIRILLO, G
    ARIANI, A
    SANTILLI, D
    BAGAGLINI, E
    CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1989, 46 (01): : 180 - 186
  • [38] Effects of antihypertensive agents on renal and vascular protection in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension
    Leonova, M.
    Belousov, Yu.
    Tarasov, A.
    Eremina, Yu.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2007, 25 : S378 - S379
  • [39] THE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF A LOW-DOSE COMBINATION OF RAMIPRIL AND FELODIPINE ER IN MILD-TO-MODERATE ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    BAINBRIDGE, AD
    MACFADYEN, RJ
    STARK, S
    LEES, KR
    REID, JL
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 36 (04) : 323 - 330
  • [40] Antihypertensive Efficacy of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Candesartan Cilexetil Assessed by 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Essential Hypertension
    Hans R. Brunner
    Klaus O. Stumpe
    Andrzej Januszewicz
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2003, 23 : 419 - 430