Effects of Numerical Schemes on Large Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Planar Gas Jet and Diesel Spray

被引:4
|
作者
Tsang, Chi-Wei [1 ]
Rutland, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.4271/2016-01-0866
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Three time integration schemes and four finite volume interpolation schemes for the convection term in momentum equation were tested under turbulent planar gas jet and Sandia non-reacting vaporizing Spray-H cases. The three time integration schemes are the first-order Euler implicit scheme, the second-order backward scheme, and the second-order Crank-Nicolson scheme. The four spatial interpolation schemes are cubic central, linear central, upwind, and vanLeer schemes. Velocity magnitude contour, centerline and radial mean velocity and Reynolds stress profiles for the planar turbulent gas jet case, and fuel vapor contour and liquid and vapor penetrations for the Diesel spray case predicted by the different numerical schemes were compared. The sensitivity of the numerical schemes to mesh resolution was also investigated. The non-viscosity based dynamic structure subgrid model was used. The numerical tool used in this study was OpenFOAM. Results showed that the first-order Euler implicit schemes predict wider range of length scales as seen in velocity and fuel vapor contour plots, while the second-order time integration schemes predict more small scale structures. The non-monotonic central schemes show less grid sensitivity than the monotonic schemes. Overall the cubic central scheme with the Euler implicit scheme gives the best performance. The first-order upwind scheme gave poor results, so it should be avoided to use in simulating high-pressure fuel injection process.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 164
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Mixing, intermittency and Large Eddy Simulation of a turbulent round jet
    Dinesh, K. K. J. Ranga
    Jenkins, K. W.
    Savill, A. M.
    Kirkpatrick, M. P.
    PROGRESS IN COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2012, 12 (05): : 342 - 352
  • [32] Large eddy simulation of a coaxial jet with a synthetic turbulent inlet
    Abboud, Alex W.
    Smith, Sean T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND FLUID FLOW, 2014, 50 : 240 - 253
  • [33] Large eddy simulation of turbulent lean premixed jet flame
    Zhang, Hong-Da
    Ye, Tao-Hong
    Chen, Jing
    Zhao, Ma-Jie
    Tuijin Jishu/Journal of Propulsion Technology, 2015, 36 (07): : 1027 - 1035
  • [34] Large eddy simulation of the vortex breakdown in a turbulent swirling jet
    Borynyak, K., I
    XXXV SIBERIAN THERMOPHYSICAL SEMINAR, 2019, 2019, 1382
  • [35] Large Eddy Simulation of the sound field of a round turbulent jet
    Boersma, BJ
    THEORETICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS, 2005, 19 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [36] Large-eddy simulation of a turbulent compressible round jet
    DeBonis, JR
    Scott, JN
    AIAA JOURNAL, 2002, 40 (07) : 1346 - 1354
  • [37] Large eddy simulation of spark ignition in a turbulent methane jet
    Lacaze, G.
    Richardson, E.
    Poinsot, T.
    COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2009, 156 (10) : 1993 - 2009
  • [38] Large eddy simulation of a turbulent reacting jet-flame
    Steiner, H
    Bushe, WK
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ANGEWANDTE MATHEMATIK UND MECHANIK, 2001, 81 : S563 - S564
  • [39] Large Eddy Simulation of the sound field of a round turbulent jet
    Bendiks Jan Boersma
    Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 2005, 19 : 161 - 170
  • [40] Large Eddy Simulation on the Effects of Pressure on Syngas/Air Turbulent Nonpremixed Jet Flames
    Ciottoli, Pietro P.
    Lee, Bok Jik
    Lapenna, Pasquale E.
    Galassi, Riccardo Malpica
    Hernandez-Perez, Francisco E.
    Martelli, Emanuele
    Valorani, Mauro
    Im, Hong G.
    COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 192 (10) : 1963 - 1996