CLINICAL UTILITY OF TPS, TPA AND CA 19-9 MEASUREMENT IN PANCREATIC-CANCER

被引:0
|
作者
PLEBANI, M
BASSO, D
DELFAVERO, G
FERRARA, C
MEGGIATO, T
FOGAR, P
MANGANO, F
RICCIARDI, G
BURLINA, A
机构
[1] UNIV PADUA,INST LAB MED,I-35100 PADUA,ITALY
[2] UNIV PADUA,DEPT GASTROENTEROL,I-35100 PADUA,ITALY
[3] UNIV PADUA,DEPT RADIOL 1,I-35100 PADUA,ITALY
关键词
PANCREATIC CANCER; CHRONIC PANCREATITIS; TPS; TPA; CA; 19-9;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aims of this study were to (1) evaluate the diagnostic utility of a new tumor marker, TPS, with respect to TPA and CA 19-9 in patients with pancreatic cancer; (2) ascertain the reliability of the markers in predicting survival, and (3) evaluate the effect of liver dysfunction on the results. CA 19-9, TPA and TPS were measured in the serum of 19 control subjects, 42 patients with pancreatic cancer, 29 with chronic pancreatitis, and 52 with extrapancreatic diseases. CA 19-9 was confirmed to be the best serological indicator of pancreatic cancer, while TPA and TPS lacked both sensitivity and specificity. Pancreatic cancer patients with liver metastases had higher mean CA 19-9 and TPA, but not TPS, values than pancreatic cancer patients without metastases. A shorter survival time was associated with the presence of liver metastases and with higher serum tumor marker levels. CA 19-9, TPA and TPS were found to be correlated with liver function test results (ALT, ALP and bilirubin). In conclusion: (1) TPS adds no significant information to that obtained using CA 19-9 in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer; (2) CA 19-9 and TPA, but not TPS, are influenced by the presence of liver metastases; (3) the main factor to influence survival is advanced disease, which is in turn associated with higher tumor marker levels, and (4) liver dysfunction can influence not only CA 19-9 and TPA, as already described, but also TPS.
引用
收藏
页码:436 / 440
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical utility of the ARCHITECT® CA 19-9™XR assay
    O'Morchoe, S.
    Covert, B.
    Smith, G.
    Kula, K.
    Olson, J.
    Thomas, Rosiere
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2006, 27 : 77 - 77
  • [32] RAPID DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC-CANCER BY COMBINATION OF ULTRASONOGRAPHY AND SERUM TUMOR-MARKERS CA 19-9 AND CA 50
    BOVO, P
    RIGO, L
    TOGNI, M
    MONTESI, G
    DIFRANCESCO, V
    BRUNORI, MP
    ANGELINI, G
    FRULLONI, L
    MARCORI, M
    CAVALLINI, G
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1993, 25 (09): : 477 - 481
  • [33] SERUM PANCREATIC ONCOFETAL ANTIGEN AND CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGEN 19-9 IN PANCREATIC-CANCER PATIENTS
    SHAHANGIAN, S
    FRITSCHE, HA
    GELDER, FB
    HUGHES, JI
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1987, 33 (06) : 932 - 932
  • [34] New Observations on the Utility of CA 19-9 as a Biomarker in Lewis Negative Patients With Pancreatic Cancer
    Luo, G.
    Yu, X.
    Warshaw, A. L.
    PANCREAS, 2018, 47 (10) : 1407 - 1407
  • [35] AN INITIAL APPRAISAL OF THE VALUE OF SERUM CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGENIC DETERMINANT (CA 19-9) LEVELS IN PATIENTS WITH PANCREATIC-CANCER
    BUAMAH, PK
    CORNELL, C
    VENABLES, CW
    SKILLEN, AW
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER & CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 23 (01): : 87 - &
  • [36] CA 19-9 serum course and prognosis of pancreatic cancer
    Safi, F
    Schlosser, W
    Falkenreck, S
    Beger, HG
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY, 1996, 20 (03) : 155 - 161
  • [37] COMPARATIVE-STUDIES ON EXPRESSION OF CA 19-9 AND DU-PAN-2 IN PANCREATIC-CANCER TISSUE
    TAKASAKI, H
    UCHIDA, E
    TEMPERO, MA
    BURNETT, DA
    METZGAR, RS
    POUR, PM
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PANCREATOLOGY, 1987, 2 (5-6) : 349 - 360
  • [38] CA 19-9 in pancreatic cancer - from diagnosis to therapy
    Rainer, Klapdor
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2006, 27 : 19 - 19
  • [39] CA 19-9 and Lewis Antigens in Pancreatic Cancer Reply
    Berger, Adam C.
    Hoffman, John P.
    Winter, Kathryn
    Regine, William
    Safran, Howard
    Abrams, Ross
    Willet, Christopher
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 27 (15) : 2573 - 2573
  • [40] The impact of CA 19-9 on survival in patients with clinical stage I pancreatic cancer
    Melucci, Alexa D.
    Chacon, Alexander C.
    Burchard, Paul R.
    Ullman, Nicholas A.
    Tsagkalidis, Vasleios
    Casabianca, Anthony S.
    Reitz, Alexandra
    Swift, David A.
    Goyal, Subir
    Switchenko, Jeffrey M.
    Carpizo, Darren R.
    Shah, Mihir Maheshkumar
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 40 (04)