THORACIC EPIDURAL INFUSION FOR POSTOPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF FOLLOWING ABDOMINAL AORTIC-SURGERY - BUPIVACAINE, FENTANYL OR A MIXTURE OF BOTH

被引:58
|
作者
GEORGE, KA
CHISAKUTA, AM
GAMBLE, JAS
BROWNE, GA
机构
[1] QUEENS UNIV BELFAST,DEPT ANAESTHET,WHITLA MED BLDG,97 LISBURN RD,BELFAST BT9 7AL,NORTH IRELAND
[2] BELFAST CITY HOSP,DEPT CLIN ANAESTHESIA,BELFAST BT9 7AB,NORTH IRELAND
关键词
ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUE; REGIONAL; EPIDURAL; ANALGESICS; FENTANYL; ANESTHETICS; LOCAL; BUPIVACAINE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2044.1992.tb02218.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Thirty patients who had undergone elective abdominal aortic surgery were studied in a prospective, randomised double‐blind comparison of thoracic epidural 0.2% bupivacaine alone, thoracic epidural fentanyl alone and thoracic epidural 0.2% bupivacaine combined with fentanyl. Pain relief, pulmonary function, cardiovascular stability and side effects were assessed. Pain relief was excellent in the combined bupivacaine‐fentanyl series, being significantly better than the other groups (p < 0.05) during the entire study period and was not accompanied by hypotension. Forced expiratory parameters were reduced in all groups throughout the study to 50–60% of the pre‐operative values, but there were no significant differences between groups. The incidence of side effects attributable to either epidural bupivacaine or fentanyl was low. This study supports the increasing use of epidural infusion analgesia for postoperative pain management after abdominal surgery. Copyright © 1992, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 394
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preoperative epidural fentanyl reduces postoperative pain after upper abdominal surgery
    Katsushi Doi
    Manami Yamanaka
    Atsuko Shono
    Noriko Fukuda
    Yoji Saito
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2007, 21 : 439 - 441
  • [22] A comparison of epidural saline, morphine, and bupivacaine for pain relief after abdominal surgery in goats
    Hendrickson, DA
    KruseElliott, KT
    Broadstone, RV
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 1996, 25 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [23] RELIEF OF PAIN FOLLOWING UPPER ABDOMINAL OPERATIONS BY THORACIC EPIDURAL BLOCK WITH ETIDOCAINE
    BUCKLEY, P
    SIMPSON, R
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1975, : 76 - 79
  • [24] Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery
    Nishimori, M.
    Ballantyne, J. C.
    Low, J. H. S.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2006, (03):
  • [25] Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery
    Guay, Joanne
    Kopp, Sandra
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2016, (01):
  • [26] Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid-based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery
    Nishimori, Mina
    Low, James H. S.
    Zheng, Hui
    Ballantyne, Jane C.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (07):
  • [27] Epidural bupivacaine plus hydromorphone for postoperative pain control in pediatric urologic surgery patients: A comparison with bupivacaine plus fentanyl
    Cravero, JP
    Lerner, L
    Beach, M
    Surgenor, S
    Cendron, M
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (3A) : U227 - U227
  • [28] Effects of epidural analgesia with different concentrations of bupivacaine plus fentanyl on pain in patients undergoing thoracic surgery
    Li, Hao
    Wang, Baosheng
    Wang, Fumei
    Xu, Zan
    Zhou, Naibao
    Wang, Xiuqin
    Wang, Kaiguo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (08): : 14123 - 14126
  • [29] A comparison of epidural bupivacaine 0.125% and 0.0625% for the management of postoperative pain following major abdominal surgery: a randomised controlled trial
    Cupitt, JM
    Duncan, F
    Vernon, P
    Marshall, J
    Nield, A
    ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (03) : 304 - 304
  • [30] Patient-controlled thoracic epidural infusion with ropivacaine 0.375% provides comparable pain relief as bupivacaine 0.125% plus sufentanil after major abdominal gynecologic tumor surgery
    Gottschalk, A
    Freitag, M
    Burmeister, MA
    Becker, C
    Horn, EP
    Standl, T
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (04) : 367 - 373