COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

被引:14
|
作者
DEJAGER, AG
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, WH 2.137, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB
来源
关键词
ACTIVE SUSPENSION; LINEAR QUADRATIC CONTROL; H-INFINITY CONTROL; AUTOMOBILE DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1002/oca.4660120305
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The design of controllers for active suspension systems can be formulated as an optimal control problem. The main objective of the controller is to isolate parts of the system from vibrations in other parts. Additional constraints are limited suspension travel, limited actuator force and good track-holding capability. The objective and the constraints can be used in the formulation of an optimality criterion. Two criteria are examined, with the corresponding LQ and H-infinity control design methods. The methods are compared with respect to their ability to generate a controller that achieves the best performance. For the LQ method three controllers with different structures were generated. To illustrate the use of the design methods, controllers have been designed for a simple but typical suspension system. For this system the controllers based on a quadratic norm perform comparably but the controllers based on output feedback are less robust. The H-infinity controller did not perform well for this problem when the same weighting functions were used to generate the controller as for the LQ method. Use of the H-infinity design method therefore requires careful tuning of the weighting functions. Use of the standard functions is inappropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 188
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Intelligent Control of Active Suspension Systems
    Lin, Jeen
    Lian, Ruey-Jing
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2011, 58 (02) : 618 - 628
  • [42] Active and Semi-active Suspension Systems: A Review
    Hurel Ezeta, Jorge
    Mandow, Anthony
    Garcia Cerezo, Alfonso
    REVISTA IBEROAMERICANA DE AUTOMATICA E INFORMATICA INDUSTRIAL, 2013, 10 (02): : 121 - 132
  • [43] Comparison of ASTM and CIPAC Suspension Methods
    Costello, Lauren
    Lindner, Greg
    PESTICIDE FORMULATIONS AND DELIVERY SYSTEMS, 28TH VOLUME: GLOBAL TRENDS AND REGULATORY DRIVERS IN THE CROP PROTECTION INDUSTRY, 2009, 1507 : 103 - 113
  • [44] Comparison of Control Strategies in the Design of Semi-Active Secondary Suspension of a Railway Wagon
    Tadepalli R.K.
    Sastry D.V.A.R.
    Rao K.N.
    Rao C.S.P.
    International Journal of Vehicle Structures and Systems, 2023, 15 (06) : 797 - 801
  • [45] Comparison of observer approaches for actuator fault estimation in semi-active suspension systems
    Nguyen, M. Q.
    Sename, O.
    Dugard, L.
    2016 3RD CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AND FAULT-TOLERANT SYSTEMS (SYSTOL), 2016, : 227 - 232
  • [46] A comparison of optimal semi-active suspension systems regarding vehicle ride comfort
    Koulocheris, Dimitrios
    Papaioannou, Georgios
    Chrysos, Emmanouil
    INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF AUTOMOTIVE AND TRANSPORT ENGINEERING - MOBILITY ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENT (CAR2017), 2017, 252
  • [47] An adaptive fuzzy controller for 1/2 vehicle active suspension systems
    Kuo-Ching Chiou
    Shiuh-Jer Huang
    2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN, AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-6, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 1010 - +
  • [48] Robust event-triggered H∞ controller design for vehicle active suspension systems
    Guan, Yanpeng
    Han, Qing-Long
    Yao, Huijuan
    Ge, Xiaohua
    NONLINEAR DYNAMICS, 2018, 94 (01) : 627 - 638
  • [49] Design of Immune-Algorithm-Based Adaptive Fuzzy Controllers for Active Suspension Systems
    Shieh, Ming-Yuan
    Chiou, Juing-Shian
    Liu, Ming-Tang
    ADVANCES IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014,
  • [50] Nonlinear control design of anti-lock braking systems with assistance of active suspension
    Lin, J.-S.
    Ting, W.-E.
    IET CONTROL THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 1 (01): : 343 - 348