COMPARISON OF 2 METHODS FOR THE DESIGN OF ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS

被引:14
|
作者
DEJAGER, AG
机构
[1] Department of Mechanical Engineering, WH 2.137, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 5600 MB
来源
关键词
ACTIVE SUSPENSION; LINEAR QUADRATIC CONTROL; H-INFINITY CONTROL; AUTOMOBILE DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1002/oca.4660120305
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The design of controllers for active suspension systems can be formulated as an optimal control problem. The main objective of the controller is to isolate parts of the system from vibrations in other parts. Additional constraints are limited suspension travel, limited actuator force and good track-holding capability. The objective and the constraints can be used in the formulation of an optimality criterion. Two criteria are examined, with the corresponding LQ and H-infinity control design methods. The methods are compared with respect to their ability to generate a controller that achieves the best performance. For the LQ method three controllers with different structures were generated. To illustrate the use of the design methods, controllers have been designed for a simple but typical suspension system. For this system the controllers based on a quadratic norm perform comparably but the controllers based on output feedback are less robust. The H-infinity controller did not perform well for this problem when the same weighting functions were used to generate the controller as for the LQ method. Use of the H-infinity design method therefore requires careful tuning of the weighting functions. Use of the standard functions is inappropriate.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 188
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison study of passive, active, and semi-active suspension systems
    Demircioǧlu, Ufuk
    Çakir, Mutlu Tarik
    International Journal of Vehicle Noise and Vibration, 2024, 20 (02) : 107 - 118
  • [2] A Survey on Passive, Active and Semiactive Automotive Suspension Systems and Analyzing Tradeoffs in Design of Suspension Systems
    Eligar, Sanjay S.
    Banakar, R. M.
    2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RECENT INNOVATIONS IN ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONICS & COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING (ICRIEECE 2018), 2018, : 2908 - 2913
  • [3] Fault Estimation Methods for Semi-Active Suspension Systems
    Hernandez-Alcantara, Diana
    Morales-Menendez, Ruben
    Amezquita-Brooks, Luis
    Sename, Olivier
    Dugard, Luc
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL AUTUMN MEETING ON POWER, ELECTRONICS AND COMPUTING (ROPEC), 2015,
  • [4] A Robust Predictive Control Design for Nonlinear Active Suspension Systems
    Bououden, Sofiane
    Chadli, Mohammed
    Karimi, Hamid Reza
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2016, 18 (01) : 122 - 132
  • [5] Constraint-following control design for active suspension systems
    Qin, Wu
    Shangguan, Wen-Bin
    Yin, Hui
    Chen, Ye-Hwa
    Huang, Jin
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 154
  • [6] Robust Controller Design for Active Suspension systems of Road Vehicles
    Zhu, Shenjin
    He, Yuping
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2017, VOL 12, 2018,
  • [7] CONTROL DESIGN OF SEMI-ACTIVE SEAT SUSPENSION SYSTEMS
    Maciejewski, Igor
    Krzyzynski, Tomasz
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL AND APPLIED MECHANICS, 2011, 49 (04) : 1151 - 1168
  • [8] Design and analysis of an intelligent controller for active geometry suspension systems
    Goodarzi, Avesta
    Oloomi, Ehsan
    Esmailzadeh, Ebrahim
    VEHICLE SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2011, 49 (1-2) : 333 - 359
  • [9] FREQUENCY DOMAIN H∞ CONTROL DESIGN FOR ACTIVE SUSPENSION SYSTEMS
    Mrazgua, Jamal .
    Tissir, El Houssaine
    Ouahi, Mohamed
    DISCRETE AND CONTINUOUS DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS-SERIES S, 2022, 15 (01): : 196 - 212
  • [10] Load-dependent observer design for active suspension systems
    Zhang, Hui
    Wang, Junmin
    Zhang, Nong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VEHICLE DESIGN, 2015, 68 (1-3) : 162 - 179