A COMPARATIVE TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE CEFACLOR AND MACROCRYSTALLINE NITROFURANTOIN IN THE PREVENTION OF RECURRENT URINARY-TRACT INFECTION

One hundred and twenty women, aged between 18 and 90 years, with a history of at least four episodes of symptomatic urinary tract infection in the preceding 12 months, were randomized in an open, prospective study to prophylactic treatment with cefaclor 250 mg at bedtime or macrocrystalline nitrofurantoin 50 mg at bedtime for 12 months, Ninety-seven (49 taking cefaclor, 48 taking macrocrystalline nitrofurantoin) were assessed for efficacy; 80% of these were symptomatically improved and remained abacteriuric during the period of prophylaxis. Symptomatic attacks while patients were taking prophylaxis occurred at least five times less often than before prophylaxis had started, Seventy percent of the patients continued in an improved condition after having stopped prophylaxis. All 120 patients were assessed for adverse events; these were twice as frequent in patients taking macrocrystalline nitrofurantoin (20% vs. 10%), but only 11 patients (three taking cefaclor, eight taking macrocrystalline nitrofurantoin) withdrew from the study Due to the small numbers of patients experiencing adverse events, these differences are not statistically significant, No significant changes in haematological or biochemical parameters were found during or after the end of the 12-month course. The 22 patients assessable for efficacy who had a non-obstructive radiological abnormality responded as well to prophylaxis as those with no detectable abnormality, Long-term, low-dose prophylaxis,vith a suitable antimicrobial agent is highly effective management for patients,vith recurrent urinary tract infections, and can appropriately be provided by the family doctor. Prophylaxis given for 1 year gives better results than when given for 6 months.