SYSTEMIC ADMINISTRATION OF THE NMDA RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST MK-801 POTENTIATES CIRCLING INDUCED BY INTRASTRIATAL MICROINJECTION OF DOPAMINE

被引:19
|
作者
STPIERRE, JA
BEDARD, PJ
机构
[1] UNIV LAVAL,DEPT PHARMACOL,QUEBEC CITY,PQ G1J 1Z4,CANADA
[2] HOP ENFANTS JESUS,CTR RECH NEUROBIOL,QUEBEC CITY,PQ G1J 1Z4,CANADA
[3] UNIV LAVAL,DEPT NEUROL SCI,QUEBEC CITY,PQ G1J 1Z4,CANADA
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
DOPAMINE; MICROINJECTION; MK-801; CIRCLING; POTENTIATION; STRIATUM; RAT; 6-HYDROXYDOPAMINE;
D O I
10.1016/0014-2999(94)00612-B
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Systemic administration of the non-competitive antagonist of NMDA receptors MK-801 ((+)-5-methyl-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5,10-imine) potentiates the circling response induced by direct stimulation of the striatal dopaminergic receptors through intracerebral application of dopamine. Microinjection of dopamine (1, 5, 25 or 50 mu g/1.0 mu l) induced a dose-dependent contralateral circling response, when injected directly into the lesioned side of unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine-lesioned rats. Interestingly, intrastriatal application of dopamine (1, 5, 25 or 50 mu g/1.0 mu l) followed by a systemic administration of MK-801 (100 mu g/kg i.p.) produced a potentiated contralateral circling response in unilaterally 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned rats. This motor effect is reversed compared to the marked ipsilateral circling response produced by MK-801 when given alone. Moreover, the potentiated responses persist 4-fold longer compared to the circling induced by dopamine alone. The results suggest that the potentiation by NMDA receptor antagonists of motor activity induced by dopaminergic agonists in animal models of Parkinson's disease cannot be ascribed simply to increased release of dopamine. Other mechanisms including increased sensitivity of dopamine D-1 receptors or blockade or glutamatergic transmission in output structures must be considered.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 129
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protective Effect of Resveratrol on Kidney and Liver Histopathology Induced by NMDA Receptor Antagonist Mk-801 in Mice
    Akosman, Murat Sirri
    Demirel, Hasan Huseyin
    Turkmen, Ruhi
    [J]. KAFKAS UNIVERSITESI VETERINER FAKULTESI DERGISI, 2020, 26 (01) : 83 - 87
  • [32] CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ANTICONFLICT EFFECT OF MK-801, A NONCOMPETITIVE NMDA ANTAGONIST
    SODERPALM, AK
    BLOMQVIST, O
    ENGEL, JA
    SODERPALM, B
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 76 (02): : 122 - 127
  • [33] BLOCKADE OF CHRONIC TOLERANCE TO ETHANOL BY THE NMDA ANTAGONIST, (+)-MK-801
    WU, PH
    MIHIC, SJ
    LIU, JF
    LE, AD
    KALANT, H
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 231 (02) : 157 - 164
  • [34] THE NMDA-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST MK-801 IMPAIRS NAVIGATIONAL LEARNING IN HOMING PIGEONS
    RITERS, LV
    BINGMAN, VP
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 62 (01): : 50 - 59
  • [35] Dopaminergic basis for the facilitation of brain stimulation reward by the NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801
    Olds, ME
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 306 (1-3) : 23 - 32
  • [36] Effects of the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on short-interval timing in rats
    Miller, JP
    McAuley, JD
    Pang, KCH
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2006, 120 (01) : 162 - 172
  • [37] THE NMDA-RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST, MK-801, SUPPRESSES LIMBIC KINDLING AND KINDLED SEIZURES
    GILBERT, ME
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 463 (01) : 90 - 99
  • [38] Effects of the noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 on classical eyeblink conditioning in mice
    Takatsuki, K
    Kawahara, S
    Takehara, K
    Kishimoto, Y
    Kirino, Y
    [J]. NEUROPHARMACOLOGY, 2001, 41 (05) : 618 - 628
  • [39] EVALUATION OF THE PERIPHERAL ANTINOCICEPTIVE ACTIONS OF MK-801, AN NMDA ANTAGONIST
    GRAFF, CB
    JACKSON, DL
    SWIFT, JQ
    HARGREAVES, KM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 175 - 175
  • [40] HYPOTHERMIA BUT NOT NMDA RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST MK-801 ATTENUATES NEURON DAMAGE - ARE THE RESULTS CONCLUSIVE
    SHAPIRA, Y
    LAM, AM
    ARTRU, AA
    SHOHAMI, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 4 (03) : 221 - 222