Government Incentives and FDI inflow into R&D - The Case of Visegrad Countries

被引:8
|
作者
Owczarczuk, Magdalena [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bialystok, Fac Econ & Management, Dept Polit Econ, Ul Warszawska 63, PL-15062 Bialystok, Poland
关键词
R&D; policy incentives; FDI; investment promotion agencies; V4;
D O I
10.15678/EBER.2013.010207
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The aim of this article is to identify and compare the efforts of the Visegrad countries in order to attract more foreign capital to the R&D sector. Research Design & Methods: The study is based on the Eurostat's and OECD's data. Considerations about government incentives are based on information gathered by individual foreign investment promotion agencies. The countries included the study are the following: Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Poland. Findings: The countries of the Visegrad Group are perfect example of competition in attracting foreign investors. In these countries a dynamic growth of foreign participation in the financing of research and development, as well as a growing number of emerging international research centres has been observed. Among the many conditions that shape the investment environment and inflow of investment, the public R&D support is seen as a major factor. Implications & Recommendations: Inflows of foreign direct investment in research and development has increased substantially during the last years. In the recent years increased competition can be observed among different countries in attempt for providing attractive conditions for potential foreign investors in research and development (R&D) sector. Contribution & Value Added: The role of governmental policies is important to build an economic, institutional and business environment to attract foreign investors and their R&D activities. The analysis suggests that investment incentives introduced by Visegrad countries are not sufficient for FDI inflows to the R&D.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 86
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patterns of R&D internationalisation in developing countries: China as a case
    Jin, Jun
    Wang, Yuandi
    Vanhaverbeke, Wim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2014, 64 (2-4) : 276 - 302
  • [42] Patent litigation insurance and R&D incentives
    Buzzacchi, Luigi
    Scellato, Giuseppe
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 28 (04) : 272 - 286
  • [43] Incentives for R&D for New Antimicrobial Drugs
    Towse, Adrian
    Sharma, Priya
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE ECONOMICS OF BUSINESS, 2011, 18 (02) : 331 - 350
  • [44] When Spillovers Enhance R&D Incentives
    Rittwik Chatterjee
    Srobonti Chattopadhyay
    Tarun Kabiraj
    [J]. Journal of Quantitative Economics, 2019, 17 : 857 - 868
  • [45] Patent privateering, litigation, and R&D incentives
    Lemus, Jorge
    Temnyalov, Emil
    [J]. RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 (04): : 1004 - 1026
  • [46] Patent pools and dynamic R&D incentives
    Dequiedt, Vianney
    Versaevel, Bruno
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2013, 36 : 59 - 69
  • [47] When Spillovers Enhance R&D Incentives
    Chatterjee, Rittwik
    Chattopadhyay, Srobonti
    Kabiraj, Tarun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE ECONOMICS, 2019, 17 (04) : 857 - 868
  • [48] Effectiveness of R&D Tax Incentives in Turkey
    Tas, Ekin
    Erdil, Erkan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY, 2024, 15 (02) : 6226 - 6272
  • [49] Profit incentives urged for defense R&D
    Mann, P
    [J]. AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 152 (10): : 25 - 26
  • [50] Spillover effects of FDI on the R&D capacity of domestic firms: The case of China
    Guan Jian-cheng
    Hou Run-xiu
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (13th), Vols 1-3, 2006, : 1118 - 1122