EVALUATION OF 2 INSTRUMENTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF AEROSOLS

被引:6
|
作者
TAYLOR, P [1 ]
DUDEK, R [1 ]
FLAHERTY, D [1 ]
KAEMPFE, T [1 ]
机构
[1] MONSANTO CO,ENVIRONM HLTH LAB,ST LOUIS,MO 63110
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0021-8502(94)90092-2
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
The particle size distributions and concentrations of solid and liquid aerosols were simultaneously measured with an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS) and a Phase Doppler Particle Analyzer (PDPA). Three types of aerosols were characterized: mono-sized polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres, mixtures composed of mono-sized PSL spheres, and polydisperse liquid sprays. Good correlation with PSL particle sizes was obtained by both instruments with PSL spheres in the 2-10 mum range. The PDPA had difficulty in the 1 mum and smaller size range, due to the limited resolution and nonlinear behavior of the phase-diameter relationship. For polydisperse liquid sprays, instrument agreement on concentration distributions was consistently good from 1 to about 5 mum diameter. Between 5 and 10 mum, the APS progressively predicted lower concentrations. The divergence between the two instruments may be attributable both to the design of the experimental apparatus and inlet inefficiencies of the APS.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 423
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EVALUATION OF THE DIRECT READING INSTRUMENTS FOR THE MEASUREMENT OF AEROSOLS
    KUUSISTO, P
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1983, 44 (11): : 863 - 874
  • [2] Evaluation of social network measurement instruments
    Ferligoj, A
    Hlebec, V
    [J]. SOCIAL NETWORKS, 1999, 21 (02) : 111 - 130
  • [3] Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments
    Xuedong Jing
    Chengtao Wang
    Gengqiang Pu
    Binshi Xu
    Sheng Zhu
    Shiyun Dong
    [J]. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006, 27 : 1202 - 1210
  • [4] Evaluation of measurement uncertainties of virtual instruments
    Jing, XD
    Xu, BS
    Wang, CT
    Zhu, S
    Pu, GQ
    Dong, SY
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 27 (11-12): : 1202 - 1210
  • [5] INSTRUMENTS FOR MEASURING RADIOACTIVE AEROSOLS
    BELKINA, SK
    RIZIN, AI
    FERTMAN, DE
    [J]. MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES USSR, 1992, 35 (01): : 113 - 119
  • [6] Uncertainty Evaluation and Comparison of Nanoscale Measurement Instruments
    Neyezhmakov, Kirill
    Kupko, Volodymyr
    Skliarov, Volodymyr
    [J]. 2022 XXXII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE (MMA), 2022, : 31 - 35
  • [7] Remote Sensing Instruments Used for Measurement and Model Validation of Optical Parameters of Atmospheric Aerosols
    Vladutescu, Daniela Viviana
    Wu, Yonghua
    Gross, Barry M.
    Moshary, Fred
    Ahmed, Samir A.
    Blake, Reginald A.
    Razani, Mohammad
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2012, 61 (06) : 1733 - 1746
  • [8] Evaluation of instruments for pitch measurement using a sphere artifact
    Kondo, Yohan
    Osawa, Sonko
    Sato, Osamu
    Komori, Masaharu
    Takatsuji, Toshiyuki
    [J]. PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 36 (04): : 604 - 611
  • [9] Definition and evaluation of topography measurement noise in optical instruments
    de Groot, Peter
    DiSciacca, Jack
    [J]. OPTICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 59 (06)
  • [10] Comparative Measurement of Instruments Used for Evaluation of Terrain Trafficability
    Cibulova, K.
    [J]. TRANSPORT MEANS 2018, PTS I-III, 2018, : 1147 - 1150