Uncertainty Evaluation and Comparison of Nanoscale Measurement Instruments

被引:0
|
作者
Neyezhmakov, Kirill [1 ]
Kupko, Volodymyr [2 ]
Skliarov, Volodymyr [1 ]
机构
[1] Kharkiv Natl Univ Radio Elect, Dept Informat & Measuring Technol, Kharkiv, Ukraine
[2] Inst Metrol, Natl Sci Ctr, Sci Ctr Space Time Measurements, Kharkiv, Ukraine
关键词
scanning electron microscope (SEM); transfer standard; budget of uncertainty; comparison results; degree of equivalence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
International recognition of a state national standard of units of physical quantities and confirmation of its metrological characteristics (MC) is possible only on the basis of international comparisons with corresponding national standards of other countries. This paper presents the results of the preparation for comparisons in the nanometer range of measurements using scanning electron microscopes. The measuring instrument intended for the comparisons is a measure of M5-4 model, ser.N(2)008. The issues of pre-calibration on the test object, which is a measure of WPSM-2.0K type, are considered. The test object allows determining all microscope parameters in the nanoscale range from 5 nm to 700 nm. An uncertainty budget is calculated in accordance with the Uncertainty Evaluation Guide. An algorithm and sequences for calculating the degree of equivalence of the comparison results are described.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 35
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of virtual instruments measurement uncertainty
    Nuccio, S
    Spataro, C
    [J]. COMPUTER STANDARDS & INTERFACES, 2001, 23 (01) : 39 - 46
  • [2] Analysis and Comparison of Bayesian Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation
    Cheng, Yin-bao
    Chen, Xiao-huai
    Li, Hong-li
    Cheng, Zhen-ying
    Jiang, Rui
    Lu, Jing
    Fu, Hua-dong
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [3] Comparison of the influence of CMM measurement strategies on uncertainty evaluation
    Li, Hongli
    Chen, Xiaohuai
    Wang, Hongtao
    Yang, Qiao
    Wang, Hanbin
    Cheng, Yinbao
    [J]. SEVENTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON PRECISION MECHANICAL MEASUREMENTS, 2016, 9903
  • [4] Comparison measurement of water triple point cells for uncertainty evaluation
    Kishimoto, I
    Sato, K
    Koizumi, K
    Arai, M
    [J]. SICE 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 41ST SICE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2002, : 2913 - 2915
  • [5] Comparison measurement of mercury triple point cells for uncertainty evaluation
    Sato, K
    Kishimoto, I
    Arai, M
    [J]. SICE 2003 ANNUAL CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-3, 2003, : 2598 - 2602
  • [6] On Measurement Uncertainty Introduced by Instruments in Frequency Domain Channel Measurement Systems
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhong, Zhangdui
    Bian, Xin
    Ai, Bo
    He, Zhao
    Liu, Ke
    Guan, Ke
    He, Ruisi
    Zhang, Bei
    Wu, Jianqiang
    [J]. 2016 10TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION (EUCAP), 2016,
  • [7] Inspection of the uncertainty of measurement instruments in safety instrumented systems
    Hauff, Thomas
    Liang, Wushan
    Strauss, Matthias
    Brecher, Christian
    Obdenbusch, Markus
    [J]. ATP EDITION, 2013, (1-2): : 38 - 45
  • [8] Auto-evaluation of the uncertainty in virtual instruments
    Ghiani, E
    Locci, N
    Muscas, C
    [J]. IMTC 2002: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH IEEE INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 & 2, 2002, : 385 - 390
  • [9] Measurement uncertainty in the performance verification of indicating measuring instruments
    Salsbury, James G.
    Morse, Edward P.
    [J]. PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 36 (02): : 218 - 228
  • [10] Auto-evaluation of the uncertainty in virtual instruments
    Ghiani, E
    Locci, N
    Muscas, C
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2004, 53 (03) : 672 - 677