Policy Monitoring on Accessible Technology for Inclusive Education - Research Findings and Requirements for a Software Tool

被引:0
|
作者
Estevez, Elsa [1 ]
Janowski, Tomasz [1 ]
Lopes, Nuno Vasco [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] United Nations Univ EGOV, Guimaraes, Portugal
[2] Univ Minho, Sch Engn, Campus Azurem, Guimaraes, Portugal
来源
关键词
Accessible Technology; Inclusive Education; Policy Monitoring; Software Tools; Requirements;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Statistics about disabled people usually do not receive as much attention as statistics highlighting other socio-economic problems. However, such statistics is important due to its actual weight. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), about 15% of the world population, meaning one billion people, live with disabilities, and 80% of them live in developing countries. UNESCO claims that 90% of the children with disabilities in developing countries do not attend schools. Thus, it is of upmost relevance to raise awareness and strengthen public policies for the use of Assistive Technology (AT) to ensure Inclusive Education and Access to Information for people with disabilities, particularly in developing countries. Contributing to such efforts, this paper presents research findings on policy monitoring and evaluation tools and defines requirements for a software tool for monitoring a public policy for the use of AT to ensure Inclusive Education and Access to Information for persons with visual and hearing impairments, with particular focus on Uganda. The research findings and tool requirements presented in this paper could be adapted by other countries that pursue such policies.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 37
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Coordinating links among research, standardisation and policy in support of water framework directive chemical monitoring requirements
    Quevauviller, Philippe
    Borchers, Ulrich
    Gawlik, Bernd Manfred
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2007, 9 (09): : 915 - 923
  • [42] Changing Role Requirements for Actors in the Field of Research, Technology and Innovation Policy Evaluation Challenges and possible Solutions
    Kerlen, Christiane
    Kind, Sonja
    Wessels, Jan
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVALUATION, 2022, 21 (01): : 91 - 108
  • [43] AN OVERVIEW OF TRENDS AND THEMES IN EDUCATION POLICY RESEARCH 2017 - 2021: FINDINGS FROM SCOPUS DATABASE
    Hoa, Trinh Thi Anh
    Hong, Pham Thi Thuy
    Thai, Dinh Van
    CADERNOS EDUCACAO TECNOLOGIA E SOCIEDADE, 2024, 17 (01): : 360 - 381
  • [44] Some research issues and findings concerning funding policy for science and mathematics education in South Africa
    Kahn, M
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1996, 18 (05) : 511 - 523
  • [45] Research on Building Technology of Aquaculture Water Quality Real-Time Monitoring Software Platform
    Ma, Yinchi
    Ding, Wen
    Li, Wentong
    Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture VIII, 2015, 452 : 87 - 93
  • [46] Conceptualising production, productivity and technology in pharmacy practice: a novel framework for policy, education and research
    D Baines
    I Bates
    L Bader
    C Hale
    P Schneider
    Human Resources for Health, 16
  • [47] Conceptualising production, productivity and technology in pharmacy practice: a novel framework for policy, education and research
    Baines, D.
    Bates, I
    Bader, L.
    Hale, C.
    Schneider, P.
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2018, 16
  • [48] TOWARDS AN INCLUSIVE RESEARCH CULTURE IN UPCOMING HEALTH AND EDUCATION PRECINCTS IN NEW SOUTH WALES, AUSTRALIA: IMPLICATIONS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE
    Balasubramanian, Madhan
    Flood, Victoria
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2022, 17 (01):
  • [49] Validation and Use of a Predictive Modeling Tool: Employing Scientific Findings to Improve Responsible Conduct of Research Education
    Mulhearn, Tyler J.
    Watts, Logan L.
    Todd, E. Michelle
    Medeiros, Kelsey E.
    Connelly, Shane
    Mumford, Michael D.
    ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-ETHICS INTEGRITY AND POLICY, 2017, 24 (04): : 195 - 210
  • [50] Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit
    MacLachlan, Malcolm
    Banes, David
    Bell, Diane
    Borg, Johan
    Donnelly, Brian
    Fembek, Michael
    Ghosh, Ritu
    Gowran, Rosemary Joan
    Hannay, Emma
    Hiscock, Diana
    Hoogerwerf, Evert-Jan
    Howe, Tracey
    Kohler, Friedbert
    Layton, Natasha
    Long, Siobhan
    Mannan, Hasheem
    Mji, Gubela
    Ongolo, Thomas Odera
    Perry, Katherine
    Pettersson, Cecilia
    Power, Jessica
    Ramos, Vinicius Delgado
    Slepickova, Lenka
    Smith, Emma M.
    Tay-Teo, Kiu
    Geiser, Priscille
    Hooks, Hilary
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 13 (05) : 454 - 466