THE EFFECT OF SAMPLING BIAS ON ESTIMATES OF ANGLER CONSUMPTION RATES IN CREEL SURVEYS

被引:0
|
作者
PRICE, PS
SU, SH
GRAY, MN
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
EPA guidance recommends that 30 grams per day be used to represent the consumption rate of fish caught from large bodies of water by a typical angler (EPA, 1989a). This estimate is based on the combined results of the Pierce et al. (1981) and Puffer et al. (1981) surveys of marine and estuarine anglers. An examination of these surveys demonstrates that the method used in both studies - creel survey - oversamples frequent anglers and produces a distribution of consumption rates that overestimates intake rates of the total angler population using the surveyed waterbodies. Weighting the individual survey responses by the inverse of the angler self-reported fishing frequency corrects this bias and produces a more accurate characterization of the total population of anglers using the surveyed waterbodies. This approach is an extension of the methodology used by both Puffer et al. (1981) and Pierce et al. (1981) to estimate the size of the total angler populations. The results of the reanalysis of the Pierce et al. (1981) survey indicate that the median consumption rate for the total angler population is 1.0 g/d. The results of the Puffer et al. (1981) reanalysis indicate a median consumption rate for total angler population of 2.9 g/d. The recalculated distributions of consumption rates were found to be consistent with the results of other angler surveys that use survey methods that do not oversample frequent anglers. The angler intake rate of 30 g/d corresponds to roughly the 90th and 95th percentiles of the total angler populations in the Pierce et al. (1981) and Puffer et al. (1981) surveys, respectively. The results of this paper indicate that the current estimate of 30 g/d significantly overestimates consumption for typical marine and estuarine anglers.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 372
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Bias in the memory parameter for different sampling rates
    Souza, LR
    Smith, J
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2002, 18 (02) : 299 - 313
  • [32] POTENTIAL BIAS IN HIV ESTIMATES USING RDS SAMPLING
    Guimaraes, M.
    Machado, C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2011, 65 : A74 - A74
  • [33] New outcome rates for random sampling telephone surveys
    Guilbert, P.
    Beltzer, N.
    Gautier, A.
    Warszawski, J.
    Riandey, B.
    [J]. REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2011, 59 (02): : 91 - 96
  • [34] Effect of sampling interval and temperature on the accuracy of food consumption estimates from stomach contents
    Finstad, AG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY, 2005, 66 (01) : 33 - 44
  • [35] Comparison of recreational harvest estimates provided by onsite and offsite surveys: detecting bias and corroborating estimates
    Hartill, Bruce William
    Edwards, Charles Thomas Thesen
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2015, 72 (09) : 1379 - 1389
  • [36] Blending domain estimates from two victimization surveys with possible bias
    Lohr, Sharon L.
    Brick, J. Michael
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF STATISTICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE STATISTIQUE, 2012, 40 (04): : 679 - 696
  • [37] Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys
    Linda J. Sax
    Shannon K. Gilmartin
    Alyssa N. Bryant
    [J]. Research in Higher Education, 2003, 44 : 409 - 432
  • [38] Evaluation of bias in HIV seroprevalence estimates from national household surveys
    Mishra, V.
    Barrere, B.
    Hong, R.
    Khan, S.
    [J]. SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2008, 84 : I63 - I70
  • [39] Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys
    Sax, LJ
    Gilmartin, SK
    Bryant, AN
    [J]. RESEARCH IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2003, 44 (04) : 409 - 432
  • [40] Adjusting Forest Density Estimates for Surveyor Bias in Historical Tree Surveys
    Hanberry, Brice B.
    Yang, Jian
    Kabrick, John M.
    He, Hong S.
    [J]. AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 2012, 167 (02): : 285 - 306