THE EFFECT OF SAMPLING BIAS ON ESTIMATES OF ANGLER CONSUMPTION RATES IN CREEL SURVEYS

被引:0
|
作者
PRICE, PS
SU, SH
GRAY, MN
机构
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
EPA guidance recommends that 30 grams per day be used to represent the consumption rate of fish caught from large bodies of water by a typical angler (EPA, 1989a). This estimate is based on the combined results of the Pierce et al. (1981) and Puffer et al. (1981) surveys of marine and estuarine anglers. An examination of these surveys demonstrates that the method used in both studies - creel survey - oversamples frequent anglers and produces a distribution of consumption rates that overestimates intake rates of the total angler population using the surveyed waterbodies. Weighting the individual survey responses by the inverse of the angler self-reported fishing frequency corrects this bias and produces a more accurate characterization of the total population of anglers using the surveyed waterbodies. This approach is an extension of the methodology used by both Puffer et al. (1981) and Pierce et al. (1981) to estimate the size of the total angler populations. The results of the reanalysis of the Pierce et al. (1981) survey indicate that the median consumption rate for the total angler population is 1.0 g/d. The results of the Puffer et al. (1981) reanalysis indicate a median consumption rate for total angler population of 2.9 g/d. The recalculated distributions of consumption rates were found to be consistent with the results of other angler surveys that use survey methods that do not oversample frequent anglers. The angler intake rate of 30 g/d corresponds to roughly the 90th and 95th percentiles of the total angler populations in the Pierce et al. (1981) and Puffer et al. (1981) surveys, respectively. The results of this paper indicate that the current estimate of 30 g/d significantly overestimates consumption for typical marine and estuarine anglers.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 372
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Measurement Error in Angler Creel Surveys
    Alexiades, Alexander V.
    Marcy-Quay, Benjamin
    Sullivan, Patrick J.
    Kraft, Clifford E.
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (02) : 253 - 261
  • [2] Estimating the effect of nonresponse bias on angler surveys
    Fisher, MR
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 1996, 125 (01) : 118 - 126
  • [3] Accuracy of angler-reported harvest in roving creel surveys
    Mallison, CT
    Cichra, CE
    [J]. NORTH AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES MANAGEMENT, 2004, 24 (03) : 880 - 889
  • [4] Using balanced sampling in creel surveys
    Ida, Ibrahima Ousmane
    Rivest, Louis-Paul
    Daigle, Gaetan
    [J]. SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2018, 44 (02) : 239 - 252
  • [5] Estimation of fish consumption rates based on a creel angler survey of an urban river in New Jersey, USA
    Ruffle, Betsy
    Baird, Suzanne
    Kirkwood, Gemma
    Breidt, F. Jay
    [J]. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2020, 26 (04): : 944 - 967
  • [6] Minimum fishing session duration for catch rate estimation in roving creel angler surveys
    Changeux, T
    Gallet, O
    [J]. BULLETIN FRANCAIS DE LA PECHE ET DE LA PISCICULTURE, 2002, (365-66): : 553 - 563
  • [7] PROPERTIES OF CATCH RATES USED IN ANALYSIS OF ANGLER SURVEYS
    JONES, CM
    ROBSON, DS
    LAKKIS, HD
    KRESSEL, J
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN FISHERIES SOCIETY, 1995, 124 (06) : 911 - 928
  • [8] The effect of sampling mode on response rate and bias in elite surveys
    López M.
    [J]. Quality & Quantity, 2023, 57 (2) : 1303 - 1319
  • [9] The effect of sampling on estimates of lexical specificity and error rates
    Rowland, Caroline F.
    Fletcher, Sarah L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILD LANGUAGE, 2006, 33 (04) : 859 - 877
  • [10] SAMPLING BIAS IN STATE VISITOR SURVEYS
    FESENMAIER, DR
    [J]. ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 1987, 14 (01) : 136 - 138