Meditation Programs for Psychological Stress and Well-being: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:16
|
作者
Goyal, M. [1 ]
Singh, S. [1 ]
Sibinga, E. M. [2 ]
Gould, N. F. [3 ]
Rowland-Seymour, A. [1 ]
Sharma, R. [4 ]
Berger, Z. [1 ]
Sleicher, D. [3 ]
Maron, D. D. [4 ]
Shihab, H. M. [4 ]
Ranasinghe, P. D. [1 ]
Linn, S. [4 ]
Saha, S.
Bass, E. B. [5 ]
Haythornthwaite, J. A. [3 ]
Cramer, H. [6 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Pediat, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Department Psychiat & Behav Serv, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[5] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[6] Univ Duisburg, Med Fak, Milliken Essen Mitre, Klin Nat Heilkunde & Integrat Med, Essen, Germany
来源
DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR AKUPUNKTUR | 2014年 / 57卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/J.DZA.2014.07.007
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Importance: Many people meditate to reduce psychological stress and stress-related health problems. To counsel people appropriately, clinicians need to know what the evidence says about the health benefits of meditation. Objective: To determine the efficacy of meditation programs in improving stress-related outcomes (anxiety, depression, stress/distress, positive mood, mental health-related quality of life, attention, substance use, eating habits, sleep, pain, and weight) in diverse adult clinical populations. Evidence review: We identified randomized clinical trials with active controls for placebo effects through November 2012 from MEDLINE, PsycINFO, EMBASE, PsycArticles, Scopus, CINAHL, AMED, the Cochrane Library, and hand searches. Two independent reviewers screened citations and extracted data. We graded the strength of evidence using 4 domains (risk of bias, precision, directness, and consistency) and determined the magnitude and direction of effect by calculating the relative difference between groups in change from baseline. When possible, we conducted meta-analyses using standardized mean differences to obtain aggregate estimates of effect size with 95 0/0 confidence intervals. Findings: After reviewing 18 753 citations, we included 47 trials with 3515 participants. Mindfulness meditation programs had moderate evidence of improved anxiety (effect size, 0.38 [95 Wo Cl, 0.12-0.64] at 8 weeks and 0.22 [0.02-0.43] at 3-6 months), depression (0.30 [0.00-0.59] at 8 weeks and 0.23 [0.050.42] at 3-6 months), and pain (0.33 [0.03-0.621) and low evidence of improved stress/distress and mental health-related quality of life. We found low evidence of no effect or insufficient evidence of any effect of meditation programs on positive mood, attention, substance use, eating habits, sleep, and weight. We found no evidence that meditation programs were better than any active treatment (ie, drugs, exercise, and other behavioral therapies). Conclusions and relevance: Clinicians should be aware that meditation programs can result in small to moderate reductions of multiple negative dimensions of psychological stress. Thus, clinicians should be prepared to talk with their patients about the role that a meditation program could have in addressing psychological stress. Stronger study designs are needed to determine the effects of meditation programs in improving the positive dimensions of mental health and stress-related behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 27
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Resilience, stress, and psychological well-being in nursing students: A systematic review
    Li, Zhuang-Shuang
    Hasson, Felicity
    [J]. NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2020, 90
  • [42] Forgiveness and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis review
    Gao, Feng
    Li, Yuanwei
    Bai, Xuejun
    [J]. PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2022, 186
  • [43] HIV/AIDS stigma and psychological well-being after 40 years of HIV/AIDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rzeszutek, Marcin
    Gruszczynska, Ewa
    Pieta, Malgorzata
    Malinowska, Paula
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOTRAUMATOLOGY, 2021, 12 (01)
  • [44] EFFECT OF EXERCISE ON PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN PEOPLE WITH KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Hall, M.
    Nelligan, R. K.
    Dobson, F. L.
    Collins, N. J.
    Smits, E. J.
    Ross, M. H.
    Kasza, J. E.
    Bennell, K. L.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2019, 27 : S446 - S447
  • [45] Changing Mental Health and Positive Psychological Well-Being Using Ecological Momentary Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Versluis, Anke
    Verkuil, Bart
    Spinhoven, Philip
    van der Ploeg, Melanie M.
    Brosschot, Jos F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2016, 18 (06)
  • [46] Can We Increase Psychological Well-Being? The Effects of Interventions on Psychological Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Weiss, Laura A.
    Westerhof, Gerben J.
    Bohlmeijer, Ernst T.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [47] Surgical complications and their impact on patients' psychosocial well-being: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pinto, Anna
    Faiz, Omar
    Davis, Rachel
    Almoudaris, Alex
    Vincent, Charles
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (02):
  • [48] On the Relationship Between Unprompted Thought and Affective Well-Being: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kam, Julia W. Y.
    Wong, Aaron Y.
    Thiemann, Raela F.
    Hasan, Fiza
    Andrews-Hanna, Jessica R.
    Mills, Caitlin
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2024, 150 (05) : 621 - 641
  • [49] Mood states and well-being of spouses of fibromyalgia patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Treister-Goltzman, Yulia
    Peleg, Roni
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [50] Role of β-glucan on finfish and shellfish health and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Van Doan, Hien
    Sumon, Md Afsar Ahmed
    Tran, Hung Quang
    Le, Chinh Xuan
    Mohammady, Eman Y.
    El-Haroun, Ehab R.
    Hoseinifar, Seyed Hossein
    Ringo, Einar
    Stejskal, Vlastimil
    Dawood, Mahmoud A. O.
    [J]. REVIEWS IN AQUACULTURE, 2024,