An Alternate Method of Deriving Priorities and Related Inferences for Group Decision Making in Analytic Hierarchy Process

被引:3
|
作者
Basak, Indrani [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Altoona, Dept Math & Stat, Altoona, PA 16601 USA
关键词
aggregated priority weight; dependence of judgements; equality of two priority vectors; maximum likelihood estimate; rank order;
D O I
10.1002/mcda.484
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Some work has been carried out in the past on statistically deriving priorities in Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). In AHP, the aggregated worths of the alternatives, when compared with respect to several criteria, are estimated in a hierarchical comparisons model introduced by Saaty. In this setup, statistical models are used for Saaty's method of scaling in paired comparisons experiments in any level of the hierarchy. At the end, the final priority weights of the alternatives and related inferences are developed with appropriate statistical methods. Existing statistical methods in the literature assume independence of the entries of the paired comparison matrix. However, these entries are highly dependent among themselves. In this article, we propose a statistical method that allows for the dependence among the entries of the pairwise comparisons matrix. The proposed method is then illustrated with a numerical example. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:279 / 287
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Competitiveness Evaluation of Electricity Retailers An Approach Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process and Group Decision-making Method
    Deng, Tingting
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhou, Xiaobing
    Gao, Yi
    Lou, Suhua
    2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND INFORMATICS (ICELTICS), 2017, : 51 - 56
  • [32] Multicriteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process: Suggested modifications
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Mohamed, Mai
    Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2021, 43 : 247 - 254
  • [33] Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial
    Hummel, J. Marjan
    Bridges, John F. P.
    IJzerman, Maarten J.
    PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2014, 7 (02): : 129 - 140
  • [34] Multi-criteria group decision making based on neutrosophic analytic hierarchy process
    Abdel-Basset, Mohamed
    Mohamed, Mai
    Zhou, Yongquan
    Hezam, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 33 (06) : 4055 - 4066
  • [35] Group Decision Making with the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Benefit-Risk Assessment: A Tutorial
    J. Marjan Hummel
    John F. P. Bridges
    Maarten J. IJzerman
    The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2014, 7 : 129 - 140
  • [36] VOTING AND PRIORITIES IN HEALTH-CARE DECISION-MAKING, PORTRAYED THROUGH A GROUP DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEM, USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS
    HATCHER, M
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SYSTEMS, 1994, 18 (05) : 267 - 288
  • [37] Group Decision via Usage of Analytic Hierarchy Process and Preference Aggregation Method
    Angiz, Langroudi Majid Zerafat
    Mustafa, Adli
    Ghani, Noraida Abdul
    Kamil, Anton Abdulbasah
    SAINS MALAYSIANA, 2012, 41 (03): : 361 - 366
  • [38] Intuitionistic Multiplicative Group Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Use in Multicriteria Group Decision-Making
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Pedrycz, Witold
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2018, 48 (07) : 1950 - 1962
  • [39] Using Analytic Hierarchy Process and Decision Tree for a Production Decision Making
    Hamali, Sambudi
    Suci, Rumondang Puji Nur
    Utami, Ami Fitri
    Hanisman
    Arga, Filia
    2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND TECHNOLOGY (ICIMTECH), 2016, : 329 - 332
  • [40] Negative priorities in the analytic hierarchy process
    Saaty, TL
    Ozdemir, M
    MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTER MODELLING, 2003, 37 (9-10) : 1063 - 1075