What Is the Effectiveness of Patient Decision Aids for Cancer-Related Decisions? A Systematic Review Subanalysis

被引:69
|
作者
McAlpine, Kristen [1 ]
Lewis, Krystina B. [1 ]
Trevena, Lyndal J. [3 ]
Stacey, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[2] Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, 501 Smyth Rd,Box 511, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
[3] Univ Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1200/CCI.17.00148
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose To determine the effectiveness of patient decision aids when used with patients who face cancer-related decisions. Patients and Methods Two reviewers independently screened the 105 trials in the original 2017 Cochrane review to identify eligible trials of patient decision aids across the cancer continuum. Primary outcomes were attributes of the choice and decision-making process. Secondary outcomes were patient behavior and health system effects. A meta-analysis was conducted for similar outcome measures. Results Forty-six trials evaluated patient decision aids for cancer care, including 27 on screening decisions (59%), 12 on treatments (26%), four on genetic testing (9%), and three on prevention (6%). Common decisions were aboutprostate cancer screening (30%), colorectal cancer screening (22%), breast cancer treatment (13%), and prostate cancer treatment (9%). Compared with the control groups (usual care or alternative interventions), the patient decision aid group improved the match between the chosen option and the features that mattered most to the patient as demonstrated by improved knowledge (weighted mean difference, 12.88 of 100; 95% CI, 9.87 to 15.89; 24 trials), accurate risk perception (risk ratio [RR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.56; six trials), and value-choice agreement (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.57 to 4.84; nine trials). Compared with controls, the patient decision aid group improved the decision-making process with decreased decisional conflict (weighted mean difference, -9.56 of 100; 95% CI, -13.90 to -5.23; 12 trials), reduced clinician-controlled decision making (RR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.79; eight trials), and fewer patients being indecisive (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.78; nine trials). Conclusion Patient decision aids improve the attributes of the choice made and decision-making process for patients who face cancer-related decisions. (C) 2018 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Helping pregnant women make better decisions: a systematic review of the benefits of patient decision aids in obstetrics
    Say, Rebecca
    Robson, Stephen
    Thomson, Richard
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2011, 1 (02):
  • [32] Common patient-reported sources of cancer-related distress in adults with cancer: A systematic review
    Stevens, Jennifer M.
    Montgomery, Kathleen
    Miller, Megan
    Saeidzadeh, Seyedehtanaz
    Kwekkeboom, Kristine L.
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (13):
  • [33] Supporting older patients in making healthcare decisions: The effectiveness of decision aids; A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gans, Emma A.
    van Mun, Liza A. M.
    de Groot, Janke F.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Rake, Ester A.
    van Weert, Julia C. M.
    Festen, Suzanne
    van den Bos, Frederiek
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2023, 116
  • [34] Patient Decision Aids for Colorectal Cancer Screening A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Volk, Robert J.
    Linder, Suzanne K.
    Lopez-Olivo, Maria A.
    Kamath, Geetanjali R.
    Reuland, Daniel S.
    Saraykar, Smita S.
    Leal, Viola B.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2016, 51 (05) : 779 - 791
  • [35] Prostate Cancer Screening Patient Decision Aids: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ivlev, Ilya
    Jerabkova, Silvie
    Mishra, Meenakshi
    Cook, Lily A.
    Eden, Karen B.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 55 (06) : 896 - 907
  • [36] SOURCES OF CANCER-RELATED DISTRESS IN ADULTS WITH CANCER: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Stevens, Jennifer
    Montgomery, Kitty
    Miller, Megan
    Kwekkeboom, Kristine
    [J]. ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2023, 50 (02)
  • [37] Experiences of Using Patient Decision Aids for Decisions About Cancer Treatment
    Longcoy, Li-Ting Huang
    Mathew, Asha
    Jang, Min Kyeong
    Mayahara, Masako
    Doorenbos, Ardith Z.
    [J]. CANCER NURSING, 2023,
  • [38] Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guixian Tong
    Qingqing Geng
    Debin Wang
    Tongzhu Liu
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2021, 29 : 6929 - 6941
  • [39] Web-based decision aids for cancer clinical decisions: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tong, Guixian
    Geng, Qingqing
    Wang, Debin
    Liu, Tongzhu
    [J]. SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2021, 29 (11) : 6929 - 6941
  • [40] Effectiveness of auricular point therapy for cancer-related fatigue: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Qiong
    Yang, Liu
    Huang, Shuang-Yan
    Yeung, Jerry W. F.
    Chen, Xiao-Huan
    Xue, Hui
    Xu, Li-Ping
    Suen, Lorna K. P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (08) : 1924 - 1935