Project delivery systems for nZEB projects

被引:18
|
作者
Kantola, Mikko [1 ]
Saari, Arto [1 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Civil & Struct Engn, Espoo, Finland
关键词
Project management; Construction industry; Building materials; Construction works; Construction management; Building life cycle;
D O I
10.1108/F-03-2014-0025
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The paper aims to reveal the most functioning project delivery systems for nearly zero-energy building (nZEB) projects. The focus is set to reveal the qualities of the systems that support the nZEB goals and sustainability. Design/methodology/approach - Research method used in this paper is inductive reasoning. The reasoning is based on existing literature, and conclusions are drawn by combining pieces of that literature. Findings - The state-of-the-art heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) and insulation requirements of nZEB technology and the lack of experience in the industry regarding nZEB projects suggest that modern collaboration-based project delivery systems should be favoured. The authors found that the most suitable project delivery system for a standard nZEB project is the integrated project delivery (IPD), which binds the financial goals of the main parties together via a reimbursement solution: target pricing. The authors also found the construction management (CM) at-risk system a suitable solution, especially if it is modified by adding the tools utilised in the IPD approach, thereby making it an IPD lite system. Originality/value - The paper has value for the entire construction industry in Finland and European Union (EU). The owners and construction companies can use the findings in their development efforts towards nZEB construction. The EU 2020 nZEB degree makes all the findings concerning practicalities of nZEB projects valuable due to the lack of time and the lack of experience in the industry.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 100
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of US project delivery systems
    Konchar, M
    Sanvido, V
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT-ASCE, 1998, 124 (06): : 435 - 444
  • [22] Evaluating 'Process of project delivery' between PRC and EU aid funded projects on a project site
    Kepou, Tonny
    Hong, Lu Xin
    CRIOCM2009: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND REAL ESTATE, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 1683 - 1690
  • [23] Project plans and time budgets in Information Systems projects
    Rehesaar, H
    Beames, E
    1998 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING: EDUCATION & PRACTICE, PROCEEDINGS, 1998, : 120 - 124
  • [24] Research on Factors Influencing Project Delivery System selection for Construction Projects
    Liu, Bingsheng
    Fu, Meiqing
    Shen, Geoffrey
    Tai, Shuangliang
    Zhang, Shiruo
    ICCREM 2017: PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2017, : 292 - 302
  • [25] Quantitative Comparison of Project Performance between Project Delivery Systems
    Ibrahim, Michael W.
    Hanna, Awad
    Kievet, Dave
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 36 (06)
  • [26] Integrated project delivery and associated risk reduction in construction projects in Egypt
    El-Said, M.
    El-Dokhmaesy, A.
    Younis, M.E.
    Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 2019, 66 (06): : 837 - 859
  • [27] Standardising the route to project handover to improve the delivery of major building projects
    Too, Judy
    Ejohwomu, Obuks A.
    Bukoye, Teslim Oyegoke
    Hui, Felix Kin Peng
    Oshodi, Olalekan Shamsideen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 24 (02) : 175 - 199
  • [28] Development of a Practical Project Delivery Selection Tool for Airport Capital Projects
    Nguyen, Phuong H. D.
    Tran, Daniel
    CONSTRUCTION RESEARCH CONGRESS 2024: CONTRACTING, DELIVERY, SCHEDULING, ESTIMATING, ECONOMICS, AND ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND PLANNING IN CONSTRUCTION, 2024, : 81 - 91
  • [29] Determination of the significance of project delivery attributes (PDAs) on sustainable projects in Turkey
    Aydin, Dincer
    Mihlayanlar, Esma
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 22 (05) : 1682 - 1703
  • [30] A comparison of project delivery method performance for water infrastructure capital projects
    Feghaly, Jeffrey
    El Asmar, Mounir
    Ariaratnam, Samuel T.
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2021, 48 (06) : 691 - 701