R&D resources development in life sciences ventures: a dynamic capabilities perspective

被引:7
|
作者
Carrick, Jon [1 ]
机构
[1] Stetson Univ, Dept Management, Deland, FL 32720 USA
关键词
Resources; Dynamic capabilities; RBV; Life sciences ventures; Tech entrepreneurship;
D O I
10.1108/JSBED-04-2016-0054
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to examine the development of R&D resources in early stage life sciences firms. It looks at how young firms use dynamic capabilities to develop R&D resources. Design/methodology/approach - An in-depth case study approach was used to examine the research questions. It draws on longitudinal data collected from ten life science firms. Data were collected from three rounds of interviews with each case firm. A systematic theme analysis was conducted to analyse the results. Findings - Results from the study indicate that a unique set of past decisions, future opportunities, assets, capabilities, and routines leads to the development of R&D resources. It is evident that scientific breakthroughs, partnership opportunities, the founders' experience and the firm's ability to integrate resources and learn from earlier paths are vital to the development of R&D resources. Research limitations/implications - This study extends the application of the dynamic capabilities framework to early stage life sciences ventures. It also demonstrates that dynamic capabilities can lead to the development of important resources. Practical implications - The findings from this study provide prescriptive insights for evaluating alternatives on how to develop R&D resources in life sciences ventures. Originality/value - Life sciences firms are critical to the modern global economy. However, little work examines how young, small life sciences firms develop R&D resources. Moreover, little work uses the dynamic capabilities framework as a lens to holistically examine how small firms develop R&D resources. This study helps to fill those gaps.
引用
收藏
页码:1191 / 1207
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Allocate R&D resources effectively
    Sinclair, G
    [J]. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRESS, 1999, 95 (02) : 27 - 29
  • [32] Agricultural R&D, resources, and productivity
    Heisey, PW
    Renkow, M
    [J]. LAND QUALITY, AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, AND FOOD SECURITY: BIOPHYSICAL PROCESSES AND ECONOMIC CHOICES AT LOCAL, REGIONAL, AND GLOBAL LEVELS, 2003, : 405 - 430
  • [33] On optimization distribution of R&D resources
    Zhou, JZ
    Tang, BB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SECOND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, 1998, : 437 - 441
  • [34] R&D returns, market structure, and research joint ventures
    Amir, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL AND THEORETICAL ECONOMICS-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE GESAMTE STAATSWISSENSCHAFT, 2000, 156 (04): : 583 - 598
  • [35] Research Joint Ventures and Cartels in International Product R&D
    Yang, Il-Seok
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KOREA TRADE, 2019, 23 (02): : 46 - 58
  • [36] Competing R&D joint ventures in Cournot oligopoly with spillovers
    Tesoriere, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2015, 115 (03) : 231 - 256
  • [37] The role of R&D technology in asymmetric research joint ventures
    Dakhlia, S
    Menezes, FM
    Temimi, A
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2006, 74 (01): : 52 - 63
  • [38] Competing R&D joint ventures in Cournot oligopoly with spillovers
    Antonio Tesoriere
    [J]. Journal of Economics, 2015, 115 : 231 - 256
  • [39] Imaging Sciences R&D Laboratories in Argentina
    Delrieux, Claudio
    Ballarin, Virginia
    Garcia Bauza, Cristian
    Lopez, Mario A.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2020, 63 (11) : 90 - 95
  • [40] Physical sciences R&D 'must not be cut'
    不详
    [J]. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING, 2009, 22 (05) : 11 - 11