Utilities: a Solution of a Decision Problem?

被引:1
|
作者
Koller, Michael [1 ]
Ohmann, Christian [2 ]
Lorenz, Wilfried [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Regensburg, Zentrum Klin Studien, D-93042 Regensburg, Germany
[2] Koordinierungszentrum Klin Studien Dusseldor, Dusseldorf, Germany
[3] Tumorzentrum Regensburge eV, Regensburge, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN | 2008年 / 102卷 / 06期
关键词
utility; expected utilities; decision problems; decision tree; new outcome concepts;
D O I
10.1016/j.zefq.2008.07.016
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Utility is a concept that originates from utilitarianism, a highly influential philosophical school in the Anglo-American world. The cornerstone of utilitarianism is the principle of maximum happiness or utility. In the medical sciences, this utility approach has been adopted and developed within the field of medical decision making. On an operational level, utility is the evaluation of a health state or an outcome on a one-dimensional scale ranging from 0(death) to 1(perfect health). By adding the concept of expectancy, the graphic representation of both concepts in a decision tree results in the specification of expected utilities and help store solve complex medical decision problems. Criticism of the utility approach relates to the rational perspective on humans(which is rejected by a considerable fraction of research in psychology) and to the artificial methods used in the evaluation of utility, such as Standard Gamble or Time Trade Off. These may well be the reason why the utility approach has never been accepted in Germany. Nevertheless, innovative concepts for defining goals in health care are urgently required, as the current debate in Germany on "Nutzen'' (interestingly translated as 'benefit' instead of as 'utility') and integrated outcome models indicates. It remains to be seen whether this discussion will lead to a re-evaluation of the utility approach.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 384
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Distributions over Expected Utilities in Decision Analysis
    Ekenberg, Love
    Andersson, Mikael
    Danielson, Mats
    Larsson, Aron
    ISIPTA 07-PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON IMPRECISE PROBABILITY:THEORIES AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 175 - +
  • [32] LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES - SURVEY
    FISHBURN, PC
    MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1974, 20 (11): : 1442 - 1471
  • [33] THE STRUCTURE OF SSB UTILITIES FOR DECISION UNDER UNCERTAINTY
    FISHBURN, PC
    LAVALLE, IH
    MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1988, 15 (03) : 217 - 230
  • [34] The maximum capture problem with random utilities: Problem formulation and algorithms
    Benati, S
    Hansen, P
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (03) : 518 - 530
  • [36] A SUPER-BAYESIANS SOLUTION TO A MULTI-BAYESIAN DECISION PROBLEM
    GARISCH, I
    DEWAAL, DJ
    GROENEWALD, PCN
    SOUTH AFRICAN STATISTICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 18 (02) : 111 - 122
  • [37] Transit Travel Strategy as Solution of a Markov Decision Problem: Theory and Applications
    Nuzzolo, Agostino
    Comi, Antonio
    2017 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (MT-ITS), 2017, : 850 - 855
  • [38] Decision solving algorithm for multiple optimal solution combinatorial optimization problem
    Hu, Zhenzhen
    Yuan, Weilin
    Luo, Junren
    Zou, Mingwo
    Chen, Jing
    Guofang Keji Daxue Xuebao/Journal of National University of Defense Technology, 2022, 44 (03): : 31 - 40
  • [39] PUBLIC UTILITIES EMERGENCIES - THE TRAFFIC PROBLEM.
    Thomson, R.J.B.
    Highways and transportation, 1985, 32 (11): : 23 - 27
  • [40] ON MODELS FOR ESTIMATING UTILITIES IN SIMPLE DECISION-PROBLEMS
    EHRENFELD, S
    BARISH, NN
    HUMAN SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT, 1983, 4 (01): : 34 - 38