Urban Risk Generalization in China: Space and Governance

被引:4
|
作者
Chen Jinhua [1 ]
机构
[1] Soochow Univ, Sch Polit & Publ Adm, Suzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
urban risk generalization; space production; public management; spatial management;
D O I
10.1080/02529203.2018.1519215
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
As an issue in Chinese urban development, handling urban risk generalization invites reflection on the structural features and internal development of the immediate or potential risks entailed in rapid urbanization across the globe. As part of research on national governance modernization, China has reached a consensus on managing urban risks. A study of spatial theory indicates that urban risk generalization in China is essentially a structural issue arising from an immature system of generalized benefits in urban space rights and interests along with an unbalanced spatial structure, functional disarray and ecological disruption arising from inequitable and unbalanced urban spatial development, readjustment and renovation. As an innovative form of modern urban public management with its target shifting from the pursuit of material things to people-centered development, spatial management enlists actors including government, business, society and citizens to seek a "community of shared spatial interests" with a rational structure, effective functions and an optimized environment at the level of spatial production and interest distribution. We need innovation in the spatial structures, drivers and mechanisms of urban public management and cultural ecology to realize their institutionalization, synthesis and reordering, strategically forestalling and resolving urbanization risks and realizing a spatial governance vision of the scientific, fair and sustainable allocation, growth and renovation of urban space in the risk era.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 95
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The basic problems and modes of modernistic urban governance in China
    Shen Liangfeng
    Li Jie
    [J]. Proceedings of 2006 International Conference on Construction & Real Estate Management, Vols 1 and 2: COLLABORATION AND DEVELOPMENT IN CONSTRUCTION AND REAL ESTATE, 2006, : 1271 - 1274
  • [42] Exploring the Countermeasures for the Governance of Urban Mobile Traders in China
    Han, Xiao
    Liang, Yi-Wen
    Jiang, Xiu-Min
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 4TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND CONTEMPORARY HUMANITY DEVELOPMENT (SSCHD 2018), 2018, 281 : 82 - 91
  • [43] Comparative urban governance of developing creative spaces in China
    Zielke, Philipp
    Waibel, Michael
    [J]. HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 41 : 99 - 107
  • [44] Neighborhood Aged Care and Local Governance in Urban China
    Tang, Beibei
    [J]. CHINA JOURNAL, 2018, 79 : 84 - 99
  • [45] China, Japan, and the Governance of Space: prospects for competition and cooperation
    Pekkanen, Saadia M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS OF THE ASIA-PACIFIC, 2021, 21 (01) : 37 - 64
  • [46] Governance of Urban Green Open Space for Responding to Climate Change
    Tang Yan
    Chen Kai
    Li Caige
    [J]. China City Planning Review, 2017, 26 (03) : 14 - 22
  • [47] Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance
    MacLeod, G
    Goodwin, M
    [J]. PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 1999, 23 (04) : 503 - 527
  • [48] Lifeworld and Social Space Spatial Restructuring and Urban Governance in Berlin
    Falahat, Somaiyeh
    Madanipour, Ali
    [J]. DISP, 2019, 55 (04): : 46 - 59
  • [49] The Organizational Structure and Operational Logic of an Urban Smart Governance Information Platform: Discussion on the Background of Urban Governance Transformation in China
    Kang, Junfang
    Wang, Xianjun
    [J]. COMPLEXITY, 2020, 2020
  • [50] Understanding Smart City Practice in Urban China: A Governance Perspective
    Han, Yan
    Cai, Jianming
    Ma, Enpu
    Du, Shanshan
    Lin, Jing
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)