EXPERIMENTAL FASCIOLOIDES-MAGNA INFECTIONS OF MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS-HEMIONUS-HEMIONUS)

被引:11
|
作者
FOREYT, WJ
机构
[1] Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman
关键词
FASCIOLOIDES-MAGNA; LIVER FLUKES; TREMATODE; ODOCOILEUS-HEMIONUS-HEMIONUS; ODOCOILEUS-VIRGINIANUS; EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION;
D O I
10.7589/0090-3558-28.2.183
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Six mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus hemionus) and one white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), approximately 5-mo-old, each were inoculated orally with 500 metacercariae of Fascioloides magna. All mule deer died from liver fluke infection between 69 and 134 days (mean = 114, SE = 9.9) after inoculation. Between 38 and 326 immature F. magna (mean = 102, SE = 45.5) were recovered from each deer at necropsy. Flukes were present in livers, lungs, and free in pleural and peritoneal spaces. Infection was characterized by necrotizing hepatitis, fibrosing peritonitis and pleuritis, and hematin pigment accumulation in liver, lung, and many other internal organs. Eggs of F. magna first were detected in feces of the white-tailed deer 28 wk after inoculation, and weekly thereafter until the healthy deer was euthanized at 31 wk. At necropsy, 205 F. magna, including 12 encapsulated mature and 193 nonencapsulated immature flukes were recovered from liver, lungs, and free in abdominal and thoracic spaces of the white-tailed deer. Based on these results, F. magna may be fatal to mule deer within 5 mo of infection. Like domestic sheep and goats, mule deer may be highly susceptible to infection, and it is unlikely mule deer can survive infection with large numbers of F. magna.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 187
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] OBSERVATIONS ON RELATIONSHIP OF ANTLEROGENESIS TO BONE MORPHOLOGY AND COMPOSITION IN ROCKY MOUNTAIN MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS HEMIONUS)
    BANKS, WJ
    DAVIS, RW
    [J]. ANATOMICAL RECORD, 1966, 154 (02): : 312 - &
  • [23] Genetic variation in a recently isolated population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
    Peles, JD
    Weathersbee, FW
    Johns, PE
    Griess, J
    Baker, DL
    Smith, MH
    [J]. SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 1999, 44 (02) : 236 - 240
  • [24] Resource competition and apparent competition in declining mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
    Wielgus, Robert B.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2017, 95 (07) : 499 - 504
  • [25] The effects of cattle grazing on optimal foraging in mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
    Kie, JG
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 88 (1-2) : 131 - 138
  • [26] Hybrid swarm between divergent lineages of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus)
    Latch, Emily K.
    Kierepka, Elizabeth M.
    Heffelfinger, James R.
    Rhodes, Olin E.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2011, 20 (24) : 5265 - 5279
  • [27] SARCOCYSTIS INFECTIONS IN MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS-HEMIONUS) IN MONTANA AND THE DESCRIPTIONS OF 3 NEW SPECIES
    DUBEY, JP
    SPEER, CA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 1986, 47 (05) : 1052 - 1055
  • [28] Water use patterns of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) and the effects of human disturbance
    Boroski, BB
    Mossman, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARID ENVIRONMENTS, 1998, 38 (04) : 561 - 569
  • [29] Connectivity of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus) populations in a highly fragmented urban landscape
    Devaughn L. Fraser
    Kirsten Ironside
    Robert K. Wayne
    Erin E. Boydston
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2019, 34 : 1097 - 1115
  • [30] EVALUATION OF USE OF VAGINAL-IMPLANT TRANSMITTERS IN MULE DEER (ODOCOILEUS HEMIONUS)
    Tatman, Nicole M.
    Ballard, Warren B.
    Wallace, Mark C.
    Haskell, Shawn P.
    Krausman, Paul R.
    deVos, James, Jr.
    Alcumbrac, Ole J.
    [J]. SOUTHWESTERN NATURALIST, 2011, 56 (02) : 247 - 251