Evaluating the evidence in evidence-based policy and practice: Examples from systematic reviews of literature

被引:9
|
作者
See, Beng Huat [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Sch Educ, Leazes Rd, Durham DH1 1TA, England
关键词
Evidence-based policy and practice; assessing trustworthiness of research evidence; systematic reviews; research impact; scepticism; research quality;
D O I
10.1177/0034523717741915
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
With the push for evidence-informed policy and practice, schools and policy makers are now increasingly encouraged and supported to use and enagage with research evidence. This means that consumers of research will now need to be discerning in judging the quality of research evidence that will inform their decisions. This paper evaluates the quality of evidence behind some well-known education programmes using examples from previous reviews of over 5,000 studies on a range of topics. It shows that much of the evidence is weak, and fundamental flaws in research are not uncommon. This is a serious problem if teaching practices and important policy decisions are made based on such flawed evidence. Lives may be damaged and opportunities missed. The aim of this paper is to show how widespread this problem is and to suggest ways by which the quality of education research may be improved. For example, funders of research and research bodies need to insist on quality research and fund only those that meet the minimum quality criteria. Journal editors and reviewers need to be cognizant of fundamental flaws in research and reject such submissions. One way to do this is to encourage submission of the research design and research protocol prior to acceptance, so acceptance or rejection is based on the design and not on the outcomes. This helps prevent publication bias and biased reporting. Individual researchers can improve quality by making it their moral responsibility to be truthful and transparent.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 61
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] From evidence-based medicine to evidence-based practice: Is there enough evidence?
    Nasr, Ahmed
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2010, 15 (04) : 294 - 295
  • [42] Systematic literature reviews: The cornerstone of evidence-based medicine. Evidence-based medicine Series, 2nd of 3
    Gabriel Gonzalez-Garay, Alejandro
    Luis Mayorga-Butron, Jose
    Javier Ochoa-Carrillo, Francisco
    [J]. GACETA MEXICANA DE ONCOLOGIA, 2015, 14 (02): : 103 - 106
  • [43] Promoting evidence-based practice by evaluating the quality and evidence of interventions
    Embregts, Petri
    Herps, Marjolein
    Kef, Sabina
    Maaskant, Marian
    Moonen, Xavier
    Redeker, Inge
    Schippers, Alice
    Wagemans, Annemieke
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2021, 34 (05) : 1275 - 1276
  • [44] Gaps of perception on evidence and the role of systematic reviews in evidence-based medicine
    Lee, Myeong Soo
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2019, 8 (02) : 131 - 132
  • [45] Evidence-based reviews
    Worthington, H
    Clarkson, J
    [J]. BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1998, 184 (06) : 264 - 264
  • [46] Evidence-based reviews
    H Worthington
    J Clarkson
    [J]. British Dental Journal, 1998, 184 (6) : 264 - 264
  • [47] From Evidence-based Medicine to Evidence-based Management (and Policy)?
    Aron, David C.
    [J]. MEDICAL CARE, 2015, 53 (06) : 477 - 479
  • [48] Evidence-based reviews in support of health policy decisions
    Coates, Paul M.
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (14) : 1059 - 1059
  • [49] Lessons from the evidence on evidence-based policy
    French, Richard D.
    [J]. CANADIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION-ADMINISTRATION PUBLIQUE DU CANADA, 2018, 61 (03): : 425 - 442
  • [50] Evaluating education in evidence-based practice - Reply
    Shaneyfelt, Terrence M.
    Green, Michael
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2007, 297 (01): : 39 - 40