Towards a framework for computational persuasion with applications in behaviour change

被引:30
|
作者
Hunter, Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Dept Comp Sci, Gower St, London WC1E 6BT, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Computational persuasion; persuasion dialogues; persuasive arguments; dialogical argumentation; computational models of argument; probabilistic argumentation; argumentation strategies;
D O I
10.3233/AAC-170032
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Persuasion is an activity that involves one party trying to induce another party to believe something or to do something. It is an important and multifaceted human facility. Obviously, sales and marketing is heavily dependent on persuasion. But many other activities involve persuasion such as a doctor persuading a patient to drink less alcohol, a road safety expert persuading drivers to not text while driving, or an online safety expert persuading users of social media sites to not reveal too much personal information online. As computing becomes involved in every sphere of life, so too is persuasion a target for applying computer-based solutions. An automated persuasion system (APS) is a system that can engage in a dialogue with a user (the persuadee) in order to persuade the persuadee to do (or not do) some action or to believe (or not believe) something. To do this, an APS aims to use convincing arguments in order to persuade the persuadee. Computational persuasion is the study of formal models of dialogues involving arguments and counterarguments, of user models, and strategies, for APSs. A promising application area for computational persuasion is in behaviour change. Within healthcare organizations, government agencies, and non-governmental agencies, there is much interest in changing behaviour of particular groups of people away from actions that are harmful to themselves and/or to others around them.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 40
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Towards an Holistic Framework for Environmental Change: The Role of Normative Behaviour and Informal Networking to Enhance Sustainable Business Practices
    Kathryn Knowles
    Angela Espinosa
    Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2009, 22 : 275 - 291
  • [42] Towards an Holistic Framework for Environmental Change: The Role of Normative Behaviour and Informal Networking to Enhance Sustainable Business Practices
    Knowles, Kathryn
    Espinosa, Angela
    SYSTEMIC PRACTICE AND ACTION RESEARCH, 2009, 22 (04) : 275 - 291
  • [43] CHANGING THE THEORY OF THEORY CHANGE - TOWARDS A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH
    TENNANT, N
    BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1994, 45 (03): : 865 - 897
  • [44] Towards a Computational Approach for Proactive Robot Behaviour in Assistive Tasks
    Cucciniello, Ilenia
    Andriella, Antonio
    Rossi, Silvia
    COMPANION OF THE ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2023, 2023, : 521 - 525
  • [45] A computational framework for mapping the timing of vegetative phase change
    Xu, Meng
    Jiang, Libo
    Zhu, Sheng
    Zhou, Chunguo
    Ye, Meixia
    Mao, Ke
    Sun, Lidan
    Su, Xiaohua
    Pan, Huixin
    Zhang, Shougong
    Huang, Minren
    Wu, Rongling
    NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2016, 211 (02) : 750 - 760
  • [46] ILLUSION OF ATTITUDE-CHANGE - TOWARDS A RESPONSE CONTAGION THEORY OF PERSUASION - NUTTIN,JM
    LEYENS, JP
    PSYCHOLOGICA BELGICA, 1976, 16 (01) : 149 - 150
  • [47] Investigation on fracture behaviour of UHPFRC using a mesoscale computational framework
    Hai, Lu
    Huang, Yu-Jie
    Wriggers, Peter
    Zhang, Hui
    Li, Qing-Hua
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 421
  • [48] ILLUSION OF ATTITUDE-CHANGE - TOWARDS A RESPONSE CONTAGION THEORY OF PERSUASION - NUTTIN,JM
    ARNOLD, MSC
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1976, 81 (05) : 1246 - 1248
  • [49] ILLUSION OF ATTITUDE-CHANGE - TOWARDS A RESPONSE CONTAGION THEORY OF PERSUASION - NUTTIN,JM
    FREY, D
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1976, 6 (03) : 387 - 399
  • [50] RESISTANCE TO PERSUASION - INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK
    VOHS, JL
    GARRETT, RL
    PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1968, 32 (03) : 445 - 452