FORENSIC DNA DATA BANKING BY STATE CRIME LABORATORIES

被引:0
|
作者
MCEWEN, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] BOSTON COLL,SCH LAW,NEWTON,MA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
This article reports the results of a survey of the responsible crime laboratories in the first 19 states with legislation establishing forensic DNA data banks. The survey inquired into the labs' policies and procedures regarding the collection, storage, and analysis of samples; the retention of samples and data; search protocols; access to samples and data by third parties; and related matters. The research suggests that (1) the number of samples collected from convicted offenders for DNA data banking has far surpassed the number that have been analyzed; (2) data banks have already been used in a small but growing number of cases, to locate suspects and to identify associations between unresolved cases; (3) crime labs currently plan to retain indefinitely the samples collected for their data banks; and (4) the nature and extent of security safeguards that crime labs have implemented for their data banks vary among states. The recently enacted DNA Identification Act (1994) will provide $40 million in federal matching grants to states for DNA analysis activities, so long as states comply with specified quality-assurance standards, submit to external proficiency testing, and limit access to DNA information. Although these additional funds should help to ease some sample backlogs, it remains unclear how labs will allocate the funds, as between analyzing samples for their data banks and testing evidence samples in cases without suspects. The DNA Identification Act provides penalties for the disclosure or obtaining of DNA data held by data banks that participate in CODIS, the FBI's evolving national network of DNA data banks, but individual crime labs must also develop stringent internal safeguards to prevent breaches of data-bank security.
引用
收藏
页码:1487 / 1492
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects
    Ley, Barbara L.
    Jankowski, Natalie
    Brewer, Paul R.
    PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2012, 21 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [32] A lights-out forensic DNA analysis workflow for no-suspect crime
    Taylor, Duncan
    Abarno, Damien
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2023, 66
  • [34] Laboratories for forensic expertise and their accreditation problems
    Moskvina, T. P.
    Usov, A. I.
    Kuz'min, S. A.
    INORGANIC MATERIALS, 2008, 44 (14) : 1612 - 1616
  • [35] Developmental validation of the MiSeq FGx Forensic Genomics System for Targeted Next Generation Sequencing in Forensic DNA Casework and Database Laboratories
    Jager, Anne C.
    Alvarez, Michelle L.
    Davis, Carey P.
    Guzman, Ernesto
    Han, Yonmee
    Way, Lisa
    Walichiewicz, Paulina
    Silva, David
    Nguyen Pham
    Caves, Glorianna
    Bruand, Jocelyne
    Schlesinger, Felix
    Pond, Stephanie J. K.
    Varlaro, Joe
    Stephens, Kathryn M.
    Holt, Cydne L.
    FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL-GENETICS, 2017, 28 : 52 - 70
  • [36] DNA Mixtures in Forensic Investigations: The Statistical State of the Art
    Mortera, Julia
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 7, 2020, 2020, 7 : 111 - 142
  • [37] Cleaning protocols in forensic genetic laboratories
    Kampmann, Marie-Louise
    Tfelt-Hansen, Jacob
    Borsting, Claus
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEGAL MEDICINE, 2024, 138 (05) : 1787 - 1790
  • [38] NIJ TO EVALUATE FORENSIC TOXICOLOGY LABORATORIES
    不详
    TRIAL, 1980, 16 (06): : 11 - 12
  • [40] Forensic Laboratories: Is it All about Survival?
    Champod, Christophe
    POLICING-A JOURNAL OF POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2019, 13 (01) : 47 - 54