Quality Improvement of Greenhouse Gas Inventories by the Use of Bottom-Up Data

被引:0
|
作者
Choi, Eunhwa [1 ]
Shin, Eunseop [2 ]
Yi, Seung-Muk [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Asian Inst Energy Environm & Sustainabil, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Seoul Natl Univ, Dept Environm Hlth, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Bottom-up; Greenhouse gas; Inventory; Plant-level data; Quality control;
D O I
10.5572/KOSAE.2014.30.2.161
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The methodology report '2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories' shows higher tier method can be a good practice, which uses country-specific or plant-specific data when calculating greenhouse gas emissions by country. We review the methodology report to present principles of using plant-level data and also examine examples of using plant-level data in chemical and metal industry in 20 countries for the purpose of quality improvement of national greenhouse gas inventories. We propose that Korea consider utilizing plant-level data, as reported according to 'Greenhouse gas and Energy Target Management Scheme', in the following order as a preference. First, the data can be utilized for quality control of Korea's own parameters, when Tier 2 method is adopted and bottom-up approach is not applicable. Second, both plant-level data and IPCC default data can be used together, combining Tier 1 method with Tier 3 method. Third, we can also use acquired plant-level data and country specific parameters, combining Tier 2 method with Tier 3 method. Fourth, if the plant-level data involves all categories of emissions and the data is proven to be representative, we can apply Tier 3 method. In this case, we still need to examine the data to check its reliability by a consistent framework, including appropriate quality control.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 174
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Why are methane emissions from China's oil & natural gas systems still unclear? A review of current bottom-up inventories
    Gao, Junlian
    Guan, ChengHe
    Zhang, Bo
    Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 807
  • [42] Implementing collaborative improvement - top-down, bottom-up or both?
    Kaltoft, Rasmus
    Boer, Harry
    Caniato, Federico
    Gertsen, Frank
    Middel, Rick
    Nielsen, Jacob Steendahl
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2007, 37 (3-4) : 306 - 322
  • [43] Improvement China Point Source for Improving Bottom-Up Emission Inventory
    Youjung Jang
    Yungu Lee
    Jinseok Kim
    Younha Kim
    Jung-Hun Woo
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 2020, 56 : 107 - 118
  • [44] Improvement China Point Source for Improving Bottom-Up Emission Inventory
    Jang, Youjung
    Lee, Yungu
    Kim, Jinseok
    Kim, Younha
    Woo, Jung-Hun
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2020, 56 (01) : 107 - 118
  • [46] Quality function deployment in bottom-up process for design reuse
    Tan, R., 2001, Chinese Mechanical Engineering Society (14):
  • [47] How will Canada's greenhouse gas emissions change by 2050? A disaggregated analysis of past and future greenhouse gas emissions using bottom-up energy modelling and Sankey diagrams
    Davis, Matthew
    Ahiduzzaman, Md.
    Kumar, Amit
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 220 : 754 - 786
  • [48] Bottom-up generalization: A data mining solution to privacy protection
    Wang, K
    Yu, PS
    Chakraborty, S
    FOURTH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA MINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 249 - 256
  • [49] Aluminum in-use stocks in China: a bottom-up study
    Jinlong Wang
    Thomas E. Graedel
    Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 2010, 12 : 66 - 82
  • [50] EXPLAINING RESIDENTIAL ENERGY USE BY INTERNATIONAL BOTTOM-UP COMPARISONS
    SCHIPPER, L
    KETOFF, A
    KAHANE, A
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENERGY, 1985, 10 : 341 - 405