IN-VITRO BOND STRENGTH OF 2 ADHESIVES TO ENAMEL AND DENTIN UNDER NORMAL AND CONTAMINATED CONDITIONS

被引:164
|
作者
XIE, J
POWERS, JM
MCGUCKIN, RS
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS, CTR HLTH SCI, DEPT ORAL BIOMAT, HOUSTON DENT BRANCH, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
[2] UNIV TEXAS, HLTH SCI CTR, DEPT OCCLUS & FIXED PROSTHODONT, HOUSTON DENT BRANCH, HOUSTON, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In vitro bond strengths of human enamel and dentin treated with five contaminants were measured with air, water and damp conditions as controls. Two commercial bonding agents (a lower-viscosity, solvent-containing type, AB, and a higher-viscosity, hydrophilic monomer type, SB) and their composites were applied to tooth structure under two conditions (contaminated and re-etched). Samples were debonded in tension after 24 h using an inverted, truncated cone test. Among the controls, the highest bond strengths were obtained with damp conditions for AB (24 MPa) and damp conditions or air for SB (22 MPa) with small differences between enamel and dentin. Most contaminants lowered the bond strength. Re-etching without additional mechanical preparation resulted in bond strengths similar to controls. Bond strengths to tooth structure with the bonding agents tested may be less sensitive to common forms of contamination than typically assumed.
引用
收藏
页码:295 / 299
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effect of MTAD on the bond strength to enamel and dentin
    Machnick, TK
    Torabinejad, M
    Munoz, CA
    Shabahang, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2003, 29 (12) : 818 - 821
  • [42] Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives
    Keefe, KL
    Pinzon, LM
    Rivera, B
    Powers, JM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2005, 18 (03): : 168 - 172
  • [43] SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF 2 GLASS IONOMERS TO CONTAMINATED DENTIN
    STATTMILLER, SP
    BURGESS, JO
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1994, 73 : 328 - 328
  • [44] In-vitro comparison of the tensile bond strength of four denture adhesives.
    Hall, D
    Munoz, CA
    Espinosa, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2002, 81 : A239 - A239
  • [45] BOND STRENGTH OF 2 EXPERIMENTAL DENTIN ADHESIVES AFTER WATER STORAGE
    FRANKENBERGER, R
    SINDEL, J
    KRAMER, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 428 - 428
  • [46] Effect of Storage Time on Bond Strength and Nanoleakage Expression of Universal Adhesives Bonded to Dentin and Etched Enamel
    Makishi, P.
    Andre, C. B.
    Ayres, A. P. A.
    Martins, A. L.
    Giannini, M.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2016, 41 (03) : 305 - 317
  • [47] DENTIN SURFACE-ROUGHNESS VS BOND STRENGTH OF DENTIN ADHESIVES
    FINGER, WJ
    MANABE, A
    ALKER, B
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 1989, 5 (05) : 319 - 323
  • [48] SHEAR BOND STRENGTH TO DENTIN OF COMPOSITE RESINS WITH DIFFERENT DENTIN ADHESIVES
    LEIRSKAR, J
    OILO, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1995, 74 : 413 - 413
  • [49] DENTIN SURFACE-ROUGHNESS VS BOND STRENGTH OF DENTIN ADHESIVES
    MANABE, A
    FINGER, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1989, 68 (04) : 613 - 613
  • [50] Tensile bond strength of dentin adhesives related to dentin permeability.
    Gernhardt, CR
    Schaller, HG
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1268 - 1268