ASSESSMENT OF DIFFERENT AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTION PRACTICES

被引:0
|
作者
GIAMPIETRO, M
CERRETELLI, G
PIMENTEL, D
机构
[1] IST NAZL NUTR, I-00178 ROME, ITALY
[2] RISAFRE, I-01100 VITERBO, ITALY
[3] CORNELL UNIV, DEPT ENTOMOL, ITHACA, NY 14853 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper illustrates the complexity of the assessment of different agricultural production practices. It is argued that any assessment of agricultural production should address the type of interaction between human society and its ecosystem. In fact, the characteristics of the society in which the farming system is operating and of the natural ecosystem that is altered, influence the perception and meaning of the agricultural production process. Assumptions adopted in the assessment, such as optimizing strategy and boundaries of the production system, are as important for the significance of the analysis as the availability and reliability of data. A numerical illustration of the problems inherent in the assessment of agricultural production is provided by comparing the performance of four different systems of livestock production: (i) beef feed-lot closed; (ii) beef feed-lot importing feed; (iii) beef feed-lot organic system; (iv) beef nomadic pastoral system. Some numerical indicators used in the assessment are derived from models of energy analysis, such as: the level of technological capitalization of society; the quantity of biophysical capital altered by agricultural production activities and the degree of alteration; and the ratio between densities of energy throughput in ecosystem and society.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 459
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Biogas and Energy Production by Utilization of Different Agricultural Wastes
    Meggyes, Attila
    Nagy, Valeria
    [J]. ACTA POLYTECHNICA HUNGARICA, 2012, 9 (06) : 65 - 80
  • [42] Fuel alcohol production from different agricultural materials
    Ciz, Karel
    [J]. LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2007, 123 (03): : 95 - 97
  • [43] The (un)sustainability of the land use practices and agricultural production in EU countries
    Fanelli R.M.
    [J]. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 2019, 76 (02) : 273 - 294
  • [44] Transcriptome Analysis of Potato Tubers-Effects of Different Agricultural Practices
    van Dijk, Jeroen P.
    Cankar, Katarina
    Scheffer, Stanley J.
    Beenen, Henriek G.
    Shepherd, Louise V. T.
    Stewart, Derek
    Davies, Howard V.
    Wilkockson, Steve J.
    Lelfert, Carlo
    Gruden, Kristina
    Kok, Esther J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 57 (04) : 1612 - 1623
  • [45] Sustainable Agricultural Practices for the Production of Medicinal and Aromatic Plants: Evidence and Recommendations
    Marcelino, Sara
    Hamdane, Samia
    Gaspar, Pedro D.
    Paco, Arminda
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (19)
  • [46] Thermodynamics analysis for a new approach to agricultural practices: Case of potato production
    Yildizhan, Hasan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 166 : 660 - 667
  • [47] A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
    Sara Guiti Prado
    Jaime A. Collazo
    Philip C. Stevenson
    Rebecca E. Irwin
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 9
  • [48] Irrigation management practices for wheat production in the Gezira Agricultural Scheme, Sudan
    Farah, SM
    El-Awad, OA
    Salih, AA
    Ali, IA
    [J]. ANNALS OF ARID ZONE, 1998, 37 (04) : 383 - 390
  • [49] A comparison of coffee floral traits under two different agricultural practices
    Prado, Sara Guiti
    Collazo, Jaime A.
    Stevenson, Philip C.
    Irwin, Rebecca E.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [50] The Effect of Good Agricultural Practices on the Technical Efficiency of Chili Production in Thailand
    Krasachat, Wirat
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (01)