Reform of Public Administration in Austria

被引:0
|
作者
Wimmer, Norbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Innsbruck, Inst Publ Law Financial Law & Polit Sci, Innsbruck, Austria
来源
关键词
public administration reform - Austria; public administrative science; e-government; new public management; welfare state; lean state;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Reform is the constituting principle of public administration. It is only by this institutional mobility that public administration is able to meet the changing requirements of society. The reform of public administration must comply with political rationality and efficiency. The importance and significance of these goals may differ and depend on the relevant political issues. Sometimes it may be a higher level of democracy and participation, sometimes the improvement of social performances, sometimes reduction of state responsibility by means of deregulation and privatisation. These goals contradict each other as do public reforms themselves. The international trend to reduce state responsibilities and to make public administration more efficient has been met by measures that have also been taken in Austria. In particular, the (tentative) implementation of the action programme provided by the New Public Management is a signal for the will and ability of all public actors to modernize public administration. It is evident that the reform concepts could not be realized one to one. The actors were often forced to compromise and to meet the opponents halfway. It is also understandable that the recent public reform cannot be seen as a general concept characterized by logical consistency but as a project consisting of several parts with different levels of realization. Therefore, the ongoing reforms in Austria do not only have to be seen as a success but more than this as a promise for the future.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 657
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE CONTEXT OF SERVICE QUALITY
    Cioban, Dorin
    Achimas, Gheorghe
    Budai, Alina Florentina
    Achimas, Sorin
    [J]. ACTA TECHNICA NAPOCENSIS SERIES-APPLIED MATHEMATICS MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 55 (01): : 161 - 166
  • [32] THE REFORM OF PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION + THE HUNGARIAN SYSTEM
    ZIMONYI, Z
    [J]. NEW HUNGARIAN QUARTERLY, 1985, 26 (100): : 170 - 180
  • [33] STRATEGY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM - CASE OF BRAZIL
    SIEGEL, GB
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1966, 26 (01) : 45 - 55
  • [34] AMERICAN PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION AND THE IDEA OF REFORM
    OTOOLE, LJ
    [J]. ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY, 1984, 16 (02) : 141 - 166
  • [35] THE EVALUATION OF PUBLIC MANAGERS' PERFORMANCES IN THE LIGHT OF ITALIAN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM
    Marino, Calogero
    [J]. NATIONAL AND EUROPEAN VALUES OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE BALKANS, 2011, (04): : 132 - 144
  • [36] PUBLIC SERVICES INNOVATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN THE SLOVAK REPUBLIC
    Beata, Mikusova Merickova
    Stefan, Hronec
    Nikoleta, Muthova
    Tomas, Mikus
    [J]. FINANCE AND PERFORMANCE OF FIRMS IN SCIENCE, EDUCATION, AND PRACTICE, 2017, : 685 - 700
  • [37] Challenges to the public capacity in the era of evolving public administration and government reform
    Kim, Pan Suk
    [J]. GESTION Y POLITICA PUBLICA, 2007, 16 (02): : 511 - 537
  • [38] WILSON,WOODROW, PROGRESSIVE REFORM, AND PUBLIC-ADMINISTRATION
    WALKER, L
    [J]. POLITICAL SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1989, 104 (03) : 509 - 525
  • [39] Public administration reform for Aboriginal affairs: An institutionalist analysis
    Dwyer, Judith
    Tenbensel, Tim
    Lavoie, Josee
    Martini, Angelita
    Brown, Catherine
    Devitt, Jeannie
    Myott, Paula
    Tilton, Edward
    Boulton, Amohia
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2020, 79 (04) : 550 - 566
  • [40] Introduction to the thirty recommendations for public administration reform in Croatia
    Durman, Petra
    [J]. CROATIAN AND COMPARATIVE PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 14 (01): : 281 - 282