PRIORITIZING OF CRITERIA IN TEACHER-CANDIDATE SELECTION PROCESS BY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS

被引:0
|
作者
Kasim, Maznah Mat [1 ]
Ramli, Razamin [1 ]
Ibrahim, Haslinda [1 ]
Ghazali, Mohd Izam [1 ]
Kamal, Fazillah Mohmad [1 ]
Vikneswari, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utara Malaysia, UUM Coll Arts & Sci, Changlun, Malaysia
来源
关键词
Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); importance; multi-criteria; selection; teacher; weights;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper reviews and identifies the criteria used in the teacher-candidate selection process. The identified main criteria and sub-criteria were prioritized according to their importance by a group of experts. The literature was the source of the criteria and twelve experts who have experience in teacher-selection process were asked to justify the criteria obtained from the secondary source. Furthermore, these experts evaluated the relative importance of the identified criteria in a pair-wise manner. Their judgments were analysed by a multi-criteria method, known as the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Three main criteria were identified which consisted of 'content of knowledge', 'communication skills' and 'personality', while each of these three main criteria had four, six and eight sub-criteria respectively. The degree of importance which is known as weights of these criteria were also calculated where those criteria which receive higher values are considered to be more important. Generally, the results of the analysis show that 'communication skills' and 'personality' are the most and second-most important criteria respectively, followed by 'content of knowledge' in the third position. The analysis of the importance of the sub-criteria of these three main criteria is also included. These criteria and the weights can be used later in the development of the teacher-selection model. Both secondary data and primary data were used in this research. All the experts or the respondents have experience in the selection process where 40% of them have more than six years' experience.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:15 / 28
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The analytic hierarchy process: can wash criteria be ignored?
    Finan, JS
    Hurley, WJ
    COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (08) : 1025 - 1030
  • [32] The Analytic Hierarchy Process for the Decision Tree with Multiple Criteria
    Brozova, Helena
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN ECONOMICS 2003, 2003, : 26 - 33
  • [33] Prioritizing challenges of agile process in distributed software development environment using analytic hierarchy process
    Shameem, Mohammad
    Kumar, Rakesh Ranjan
    Kumar, Chiranjeev
    Chandra, Bibhas
    Khan, Arif Ali
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2018, 30 (11)
  • [34] The Selection Process of Teacher Candidate in Austria and Turkey
    Canbulat, Mehmet
    Canbulat, Ayse Nur Kutluca
    PEGEM EGITIM VE OGRETIM DERGISI, 2015, 5 (01): : 113 - 131
  • [35] THE FUZZY ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS FOR SOFTWARE SELECTION PROBLEMS
    Basligil, Huseyin
    SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2005, 23 (03): : 24 - 33
  • [36] Analytic hierarchy process model for landfill site selection
    Mummolo, Giovanni
    Journal of Environmental Systems, 1995, 24 (04): : 445 - 465
  • [37] Suitable GUI Selection Using Analytic Hierarchy Process
    Yamada, Sumie
    Uesugi, Yuta
    Nonaka, Takako
    Hase, Tomohiro
    ISCE: 2009 IEEE 13TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 302 - 304
  • [38] Application of analytic hierarchy process for the selection of cotton fibers
    Abhijit Majumdar
    Bijan Sarkar
    Prabal Kumar Majumdar
    Fibers and Polymers, 2004, 5 : 297 - 302
  • [39] Fuzzy application to the analytic hierarchy process for robot selection
    Kapoor V.
    Tak S.S.
    Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2005, 4 (3) : 209 - 234
  • [40] The analytic hierarchy process applied to maintenance strategy selection
    Bevilacqua, M
    Braglia, M
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2000, 70 (01) : 71 - 83