BEGGING THE QUESTION AS A PRAGMATIC FALLACY

被引：22

作者：

WALTON, DN

机构：

[1] Department of Philosophy, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, R3B 2E9, Manitoba

来源：

SYNTHESE | 1994年 / 100卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1007/BF01063922

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

The aim of this paper is to make it clear how and why begging the question should be seen as a pragmatic fallacy which can only be properly evaluated in a context of dialogue. Included in the paper is a review of the contemporary literature on begging the question that shows the gradual emergence over the past twenty years or so of the dialectical conception of this fallacy. A second aim of the paper is to investigate a number of general problems raised by the pragmatic framework.

引用

页码：95 / 131

页数：37

共 50 条

[41] MODEST SKEPTICISM AND QUESTION BEGGING PROPER
Perez Otero, Manuel
[J]. GRAZER PHILOSOPHISCHE STUDIEN, 2011, 83 (01) : 9 - 32
[42] Begging the question in arguments based on testimony
Walton D.
[J]. Argumentation, 2005, 19 (1) : 85 - 113
[43] Epistemic and Dialectical Models of Begging the Question
Douglas Walton
[J]. Synthese, 2006, 152 : 237 - 284
[44] Epistemic and dialectical models of begging the question
Walton, Douglas
[J]. SYNTHESE, 2006, 152 (02) : 237 - 284
[45] Are question - Begging arguments necessarily unreasonable?
Lippert-Rasmussen, K
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2001, 104 (02) : 123 - 141
[46] NATURE OF QUESTION-BEGGING ARGUMENTS
BARKER, JA
[J]. DIALOGUE-CANADIAN PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1978, 17 (03) : 490 - 498
[47] On question-begging and analytic content
Samuel Z. Elgin
[J]. Synthese, 2020, 197 : 1149 - 1163
[48] Skepticism, question begging, and burden shifting
Moser, PK
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTIETH WORLD CONGRESS OF PHILOSOPHY, VOL 5: EPISTEMOLOGY, 2000, : 209 - 217
[49] On question-begging and analytic content
Elgin, Samuel Z.
[J]. SYNTHESE, 2020, 197 (03) : 1149 - 1163
[50] Quality, need, or hunger; begging the question
Hinde, Camilla A.
Godfray, H. Charles J.
[J]. BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 22 (06) : 1147 - 1148

← 1 2 3 4 5 →