The Assessment of Noise Exposure and Noise Annoyance at a Petrochemical Company

被引:0
|
作者
Dehghan, S. Farhang [1 ]
Monazzam, M. R. [1 ]
Nassiri, P. [1 ]
Kafash, Z. Haghighi [2 ]
Jahangiri, M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Occupat Hlth Engn, Tehran, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Dept Phys, Branch North Tehran, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth & Nutr, Dept Occupat Hlth, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Noise pollution; Noise annoyance; Petrochemical Company;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Introduction: Noise is one of the most common health hazards at the workplaces that can cause not only somatic problems, but also adversely affect mental health. The aim of this study was to investigate and evaluate occupational noise exposure and noise annoyance in one of the petrochemical companies. Material and Method: The study population included 47 people working in Administrative and Manufacturing parts of the petrochemical company. First, dosimetry of production workers and noise frequency analysis of Administrative employees were performed. Then, self-report questionnaire for the assessment of noise annoyance at workplace was completed by the subjects. The questionnaire consisted of three parts: scoring of the noise intensity in the workplace, scoring of the noise annoyance in the workplace and determining the feelings and emotions (e. g. fatigue, sleepiness, and concentration problems) that experienced by subjects during the working day. Result: The results of noise dosimetry measurements showed that mean eight hour equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure level was 86.13 dBA. According to the frequency analysis of office rooms, mean noise level and Preferred Noise-Criteria (PNC) was 69.4 dBA and 62 dB, respectively. The findings of our analysis revealed that 17.9% of administrative staff and 63.2% of manufacturing workers assigned "very high" score to the noise intensity in the workplace. The annoyance score was obtained "very annoyed" by 10% of employees of office section and 42% of manufacturing workers. For noise-related complaints and sensations defined by subjects, 49% of administrative staff and 60% of manufacturing workers marked the "sometimes" and "more" item of the questionary. Conclusion: Based on the obtained results of investigating the noise level (objective exposure) as well as the noise annoyance (subjective exposure) at the studied company, it is necessary to adopt the management -technical noise reduction measures at manufacturing sectors; as the personal noise exposure and environmental noise exposure and also noise personal exposure of administrative staff can be decreased.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / U116
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EXPOSURE LEVELS, TONAL COMPONENTS, AND NOISE ANNOYANCE IN WORKING ENVIRONMENTS
    LANDSTROM, U
    AKERLUND, E
    KJELLBERG, A
    TESARZ, M
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 21 (03) : 265 - 275
  • [42] The role of task interference and exposure duration in judging noise annoyance
    Zimmer, Karin
    Gham, Jody
    Ellermcier, Wolfgang
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 2008, 311 (3-5) : 1039 - 1051
  • [43] Transportation noise exposure, noise annoyance and respiratory health in adults: A repeated-measures study
    Eze, Ikenna C.
    Foraster, Maria
    Schaffner, Emmanuel
    Vienneau, Danielle
    Heritier, Harris
    Pieren, Reto
    Thiesse, Laurie
    Rudzik, Franziska
    Rothe, Thomas
    Pons, Marco
    Bettschart, Robert
    Schindler, Christian
    Cajochen, Christian
    Wunderli, Jean-Marc
    Brink, Mark
    Roosli, Martin
    Probst-Hensch, Nicole
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 121 : 741 - 750
  • [44] SLEEP DISTURBANCE AND NOISE ANNOYANCE AND ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE EXPOSURE IN RESIDENTS OF TWO MAJOR SLOVAKIAN CITIES
    Argalasova, L.
    Kimakova, T.
    Panulinova, E.
    Filova, A.
    Pultznerova, A.
    Jurkovicova, J.
    CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2021, 17 (02) : 690 - 697
  • [45] Annoyance and other reaction measures to changes in noise exposure - A review
    Laszlo, H. E.
    McRobie, E. S.
    Stansfeld, S. A.
    Hansell, A. L.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 435 : 551 - 562
  • [46] Road traffic noise: self-reported noise annoyance versus GIS modelled road traffic noise exposure
    Birk, Matthias
    Ivina, Olga
    von Klot, Stephanie
    Babisch, Wolfgang
    Heinrich, Joachim
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2011, 13 (11): : 3237 - 3245
  • [47] Understanding noise exposure, noise annoyance, and psychological stress: Incorporating individual mobility and the temporality of the exposure-effect relationship
    Tao, Yinhua
    Chai, Yanwei
    Kou, Lirong
    Kwan, Mei-Po
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 125
  • [48] Effects of Noise Type and Noise Sensitivity on Working Memory and Noise Annoyance
    Song, Chen
    Li, Hongqidi
    Ma, Huirui
    Han, Tao
    Wu, Jianping
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2022, 24 (114): : 173 - 181
  • [49] Evaluation of insalubrity by exposure to noise in a printing company
    Machado, Cicero Ferreira
    Fernandes Vieira de Melo, Maria Bernadete
    SHO2016: INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE, 2016, : 165 - 166
  • [50] ASSESSMENT OF HELICOPTER NOISE ANNOYANCE - A COMPARISON BETWEEN NOISE FROM HELICOPTERS AND FROM JET AIRCRAFT
    GJESTLAND, T
    JOURNAL OF SOUND AND VIBRATION, 1994, 171 (04) : 453 - 458