Probation officers' recommendations and final sentencing outcomes

被引:10
|
作者
Freiburger, Tina [1 ]
Hilinski, Carly [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Criminal Justice, POB 786,1139 Enderis Hall, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[2] Grand Valley State Univ, Sch Criminal Justice, Grand Rapids, MI 49504 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF CRIME & JUSTICE | 2011年 / 34卷 / 01期
关键词
presentence investigation reports; focal concerns; sentencing; racial disparity;
D O I
10.1080/0735648X.2011.554746
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Using the focal concerns perspective, the current study examines the factors that affect probation officers' recommendations and the effect these recommendations have on final sentencing decisions. Results indicate that there is a high level of agreement between probation officers' recommendations and final sentencing decisions. When judges depart from recommendations, departures are most often upward, with judges sentencing defendants to a harsher penalty. Although it was predicted that the variables that construct the perceptual shorthand would have a greater influence on judges' decisions than on probation officers' recommendations, this was only partially supported by the findings. Final sentence outcomes appeared to be more directly influenced by race than the probation officers' recommendations. Instead of having a direct effect, race affected probation officers' recommendations through income and education. The implications of these findings are further discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 61
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] PROBATION AND PAROLE OFFICERS - THE IMPORTANCE OF THEIR WORK
    CHANDLER, HP
    [J]. FEDERAL PROBATION, 1956, 20 (01) : 9 - 14
  • [42] MODEL PENAL CODE - SENTENCING, PROBATION AND PAROLE
    MORELAND, R
    [J]. KENTUCKY LAW JOURNAL, 1968, 57 (01): : 51 - 82
  • [43] Ending Mass Probation: Sentencing, Supervision, and Revocation
    Phelps, Michelle S.
    [J]. FUTURE OF CHILDREN, 2018, 28 (01): : 125 - 146
  • [44] HOW DO PROBATION OFFICERS WORK
    HIBBERD, MC
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE BRITISH PSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1982, 35 (MAR): : 120 - 120
  • [45] PROBATION OFFICERS MANUAL - JARVIS,FV
    JORDAN, W
    [J]. SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ADMINISTRATION, 1970, 4 (01): : 67 - 67
  • [46] PERSONALITY-TYPES OF PROBATION OFFICERS
    SLUDER, RD
    SHEARER, RA
    [J]. FEDERAL PROBATION, 1992, 56 (04) : 29 - 35
  • [47] COLLEGE EDUCATION A MUST FOR PROBATION OFFICERS
    LOUGHERY, D
    [J]. CRIME AND CORRECTIONS, 1975, 3 (01): : 1 - 7
  • [48] THE PROBATION OFFICERS TASK IS NOT A SMALL ONE
    HOFFMAN, JJ
    [J]. FEDERAL PROBATION, 1958, 22 (02) : 3 - 6
  • [49] The importance of resilience in the probation officers activity
    Trusca, Ioana
    Tomita, Mihaela
    [J]. PROBATION AS A FIELD OF STUDY AND RESEARCH: FROM PERSON TO SOCIETY, 2016, : 254 - 257
  • [50] JUVENILE PROBATION OFFICERS - A JOB ANALYSIS
    COLLEY, L
    CULBERTSON, RG
    LATESSA, EJ
    [J]. JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JOURNAL, 1987, 38 (03): : 1 - 12