An Analysis of the Media Messages during the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election: A Thematic Comparison between CNN News and Donald Trump's Tweets

被引:2
|
作者
Tari, Zeinab Ghasemi [1 ]
Emamzadeh, Zahra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
Trump; Twitter; CNN; media messages; thematic analysis; agenda setting; selective exposure;
D O I
10.5539/jpl.v11n2p78
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
In the last presidential election of the United States (2016), the interaction between the Donald Trump and the American media was remarkable and unprecedented from both political and communication perspectives. The present paper is interested in observing the interactions between then the Republican Party candidate, Donald Trump, and the media of the United States. As there were major verbal confrontations between Trump, and some media, specifically CNN, this paper observes how Trump campaign reacted to CNN that turned out to be one of his biggest opponents. The relations and reactions are explained using "agenda setting" and "selective exposure" as theories and "thematic analysis" as the research methodology. The paper analyzes CNN videos from October 7 to October 31, and Trump's tweets during the same period. The reason for conducting the research during October is that this month is regarded as one of the most critical periods in US presidential election, known as "October surprise". Then a thematic analysis of the data is conducted to extract all accusations and allegations against Trump. Research results show that President Trump did not react to most of the accusations and attacks raised by CNN. Apparently Trump had decided that ignoring and not responding is a better strategy. There was an exception to this rule: Trump's treatment toward women. He did address that issue frequently and tried to justify himself and apologize. Accordingly, Trump's presidential campaign aim was to ignore accusations, keep attacking, and answering accusations only if they are already known to too many people.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 87
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Biased into posting: interactions with social media network political posts during the 2016 U.S. presidential election
    Macafee, Timothy
    COMMUNICATION RESEARCH REPORTS, 2019, 36 (04) : 326 - 337
  • [12] Impact of the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election on Politically Divided Relationships
    Bayne, Hannah B.
    Impellizzeri, Jonathan
    Michel, Rebecca E.
    Dietlin, Olga
    van Doorn, Katie Aafjes
    COUNSELING AND VALUES, 2020, 65 (02) : 137 - 154
  • [13] The Global Stock Market Reactions to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
    Diaconasu, Delia
    Mehdian, Seyed
    Stoica, Ovidiu
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [14] Should Biden Apologize for Trump? National Remorse and the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election
    Nick Smith
    Society, 2020, 57 : 698 - 703
  • [15] It's Modern Day Presidential! An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Sentiment Analysis Tools on President Donald Trump's Tweets
    Perry, Ann Masterton
    Nurmikko-Fuller, Terhi
    Nunes, Bernardo Pereira
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 21ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENTERPRISE INFORMATION SYSTEMS (ICEIS), VOL 1, 2019, : 644 - 651
  • [16] 2016 U.S. Presidential Election and the GLBTQ Community: Introduction to the Special Issue
    Lannutti, Pamela
    Galupo, M. Paz
    JOURNAL OF GLBT FAMILY STUDIES, 2018, 14 (1-2) : 1 - 1
  • [17] Containing the Third-Party Voter in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
    Neville-Shepard, Ryan
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION INQUIRY, 2019, 43 (03) : 272 - 292
  • [18] Who Sets Social Media Sentiment?: Sentiment Contagion in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Media Tweet Network
    Joa, Claire Youngnyo
    Yun, Gi Woong
    JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2022, 16 (07) : 1449 - 1472
  • [19] The appeal to political sentiment: An analysis of Donald Trump's and Hillary Clinton's speech themes and discourse strategies in the 2016 US presidential election
    Liu, Dilin
    Lei, Lei
    DISCOURSE CONTEXT & MEDIA, 2018, 25 : 143 - 152
  • [20] Votes on Twitter: Assessing Candidate Preferences and Topics of Discussion During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
    Fang, Anjie
    Habel, Philip
    Ounis, Iadh
    MacDonald, Craig
    SAGE OPEN, 2019, 9 (01):