A Stakeholder Perspective on Buyer-Supplier Conflict

被引:8
|
作者
Mooi, Erik A. [1 ]
Frambach, Ruud T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aston Univ, Aston Business Sch, Birmingham B4 7ET, W Midlands, England
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
buyer-seller relationships; conflict; legitimacy; Netherlands; power; travel industry;
D O I
10.1080/10466690903187932
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study seeks to investigate how stakeholder power and an organization's pursuit of legitimacy influence its reaction to conflict with a supplier. We conducted an empirical study among travel agents and tour operators to test the relationship between conflict and stakeholder power and legitimacy derived from three different stakeholders. Our findings imply that power has a dual role. Whereas supplier power reduces buyer-supplier conflict, stakeholder power increases it. Moreover, this study shows that the quest to achieve greater legitimacy from the firm's competitive arena increases conflict. This study is one of the few that test stakeholder theory empirically. We demonstrate that stakeholder theory provides additional explanations above the hitherto taken dyadic approach toward understanding conflict. This study also shows that power can simultaneously reduce and increase conflict depending on which party possesses power. Greater supplier power decreases conflict, while greater stakeholder power and stakeholder-derived legitimacy increases it. Therefore, organizations have to balance their stakeholder and supplier interests.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 307
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Benevolent dictatorship and buyer-supplier exchange
    Wang, Qiong
    Jap, Sandy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2017, 78 : 204 - 216
  • [32] Supplier opportunism: Antecedents and consequences in buyer-supplier relationships
    Joshi, AW
    Stump, RL
    [J]. 1996 AMA EDUCATORS' PROCEEDINGS, VOL 7 - ENHANCING KNOWLEDGE DEVELOPMENT IN MARKETING, 1996, 7 : 129 - 135
  • [33] Buyer-supplier dyad on performance and sustainability
    Hao, Zirong
    Goh, Mark
    Jiao, Jinxia
    Liu, ChenGuang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (06) : 1171 - 1189
  • [34] Optimization models for buyer-supplier negotiations
    Talluri, Srinivas
    Vickery, Shawnee K.
    Narayanan, Sriram
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL DISTRIBUTION & LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT, 2008, 38 (07) : 551 - 561
  • [35] Managing buyer-supplier conflict when one party dominates: A process study
    Newell, William
    Ellegaard, Chris
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 2022, 107 : 176 - 189
  • [36] Structure of global buyer-supplier networks and its implications for conflict minerals regulations
    Mizuno, Takayuki
    Ohnishi, Takaaki
    Watanabe, Tsutomu
    [J]. EPJ DATA SCIENCE, 2016, 5
  • [37] Buyer-supplier relationships in industrialized building
    Bildsten, Louise
    [J]. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2014, 32 (1-2) : 146 - 159
  • [38] Buyer-Supplier Information Sharing in ETO
    Rod, Espen
    Shlopak, Mikhail
    Junge, Gabriele Hofinger
    Alfnes, Erlend
    [J]. ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS: INITIATIVES FOR A SUSTAINABLE WORLD, 2016, 488 : 903 - 910
  • [39] Symbolic Awards in Buyer-Supplier Relations
    Beer, Ruth
    Ahn, Hyun-Soo
    Leider, Stephen
    [J]. M&SOM-MANUFACTURING & SERVICE OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2022, 24 (02) : 1021 - 1039
  • [40] Buyer-supplier embeddedness and patterns of innovation
    Kim, Yusoon
    Choi, Thomas Y.
    Skilton, Paul F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2015, 35 (03) : 318 - 345