THE EDINBURGH RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF BREAST-CANCER SCREENING - RESULTS AFTER 10 YEARS OF FOLLOW-UP

被引:95
|
作者
ALEXANDER, FE
ANDERSON, TJ
BROWN, HK
FORREST, APM
HEPBURN, W
KIRKPATRICK, AE
MCDONALD, C
MUIR, BB
PRESCOTT, RJ
SHEPHERD, SM
SMITH, A
WARNER, J
机构
[1] UNIV EDINBURGH,SCH MED,DEPT PATHOL,EDINBURGH EH8 9AG,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
[2] UNIV EDINBURGH,SCH MED,SCOTTISH CANC TRIALS OFF,EDINBURGH EH8 9AG,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
[3] EDINBURGH BREAST SCREENING CLIN,EDINBURGH EH11 2JL,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
[4] SCOTTISH HLTH SERV,COMMON SERV AGCY,DIV INFORMAT & STAT,EDINBURGH EH5 3SQ,MIDLOTHIAN,SCOTLAND
关键词
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1994.342
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Edinburgh Randomised Trial of Breast Cancer Screening recruited 44,288 women aged 45-64 years into the initial cohort of the trial during 1978-81, and 10 years of follow-up is now complete. A total of 22,944 women were randomised into the study group and were offered screening for 7 years; the remaining women formed the control group. After 10 years, breast cancer mortality is 14-21% lower in the study group than in the controls depending on the precise definition of the end point. These differences are not statistically significant; for breast cancer as the underlying cause of death the relative risk is 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.61-1.11). Rates of locally advanced and metastatic cancer were substantially lower in the study group, but screening has failed to achieve marked reductions in rates of small node-positive cancers. Those women who accepted the final invitation to screening have been monitored over the 3 year period prior to their first screen under the UK service screening programme. Interval cases, expressed as a proportion of the control incidence, increased from 12% in the first year to 67% in the third year. The reduction in breast cancer mortality for older women (aged at least 50 years) is the same as that for the total study group for this duration of follow-up. For analyses of breast cancer mortality in younger women updates recruited to the trial from 1982 to 1985 (10,383 women with 6-8 years' follow-up) have been included. The reduction in breast cancer mortality for women aged 45-49 years at entry was 22% (relative risk = 0.78, 95% confidence interval = 0.46-1.31).
引用
收藏
页码:542 / 548
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] FOLLOW-UP OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    KINDLER, M
    STEINHOFF, G
    ONCOLOGY, 1989, 46 (06) : 360 - 365
  • [32] LEVAMISOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED BREAST-CANCER - A 10-YEAR FOLLOW-UP OF A RANDOMIZED STUDY
    KLEFSTROM, P
    NUORTIO, L
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1991, 30 (03) : 347 - 352
  • [33] FOLLOW-UP OF BREAST-CANCER PATIENTS
    HORTON, J
    CANCER, 1984, 53 (03) : 790 - 797
  • [34] RESPONSE TO FOLLOW-UP OF BREAST-CANCER
    HIETANEN, P
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE, 1985, 161 (11) : 678 - 680
  • [35] MEDICAL AND LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF SCREENING AND FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES FOR BREAST-CANCER
    SPRATT, JS
    SPRATT, SW
    CANCER, 1990, 66 (06) : 1351 - 1362
  • [36] Postoperative follow-up of breast-cancer patients: Screening for asymptomatic metastases
    Ciatto, S
    CANCER JOURNAL - FRANCE, 1996, 9 (05): : 243 - 246
  • [37] Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trial
    Moss, Sue M.
    Cuckle, Howard
    Evans, Andy
    Johns, Louise
    Waller, Michael
    Bobrow, Lynda
    LANCET, 2006, 368 (9552): : 2053 - 2060
  • [38] FOLLOW-UP IN BREAST-CANCER - PATIENTS PREFER SPECIALIST FOLLOW-UP
    MAHER, J
    BRADBURN, J
    ADEWUYIDALTON, R
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1995, 311 (6996): : 54 - 54
  • [39] MemoryGel Breast Implants: Final Safety and Efficacy Results after 10 Years of Follow-Up
    Caplin, David A.
    Calobrace, M. Bradley
    Wixtrom, Roger N.
    Estes, Megan M.
    Canady, John W.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2021, 147 (03) : 556 - 566
  • [40] Bowel obstruction after laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer: Results of 5 years of follow-up in a randomized trial
    Johnna Schölin
    Mark Buunen
    Wim Hop
    Jaap Bonjer
    Bo Anderberg
    Miguel Cuesta
    Salvadora Delgado
    Ainitze Ibarzabal
    Marie-Louise Ivarsson
    Martin Janson
    Antonio Lacy
    Johan Lange
    Lars Påhlman
    Stefan Skullman
    Eva Haglind
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 3755 - 3760