TNM STAGING AND LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFTER SLEEVE RESECTION FOR BRONCHOGENIC TUMORS

被引:32
|
作者
VANSCHIL, PE
DELARIVIERE, AB
KNAEPEN, PJ
VANSWIETEN, HA
DEFAUW, JJ
VANDENBOSCH, JM
机构
[1] ANTONIUSHOSP, DEPT THORAC SURG, POSTBUS 2500, 3430 EM NIEUWEGEIN, NETHERLANDS
[2] ANTONIUSHOSP, DEPT PULM MED, NIEWWEGEIN, NETHERLANDS
来源
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY | 1991年 / 52卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0003-4975(91)91287-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
From 1960 to 1989, 145 patients (132 men and 13 women) with a mean age of 60.3 years underwent sleeve lobectomy or sleeve resection of a main bronchus for a bronchogenic tumor. Squamous cell carcinoma was predominantly found (116 patients, 80.0%), followed by carcinoid tumor in 13 patients (9.0%). Postoperative staging was: stage I, 61 patients (42.1%); stage II, 47 (32.4%); stage IIIA, 33 (22.8%); and stage IIIB, 4 (2.7%). Thirty-day mortality was 4.8% (7 patients). Follow-up was complete except for 1 patient who was lost to follow-up 4 years after operation. For the whole group, 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 49%, 37%, and 18%, respectively. Better survival was noted in patients with carcinoid tumor and squamous cell carcinoma. Considering 112 patients with T2 and T3 squamous cell carcinoma, 5- and 10-year survival rates for N0 disease (52 patients) were 59% and 47%, for N1 disease (51 patients) 21% and 0%, and for N2 disease (9 patients) 44% and 0%. Differences between N1 and N2 disease were not statistically significant. Survival after sleeve resection is best for carcinoid tumors and squamous cell carcinoma with negative nodes. Presence of N1 or N2 disease significantly worsens prognosis, with no 10-year survivors and no difference between N1 and N2 status.
引用
收藏
页码:1096 / 1101
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] LONG-TERM ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC FOLLOW-UP OF PATIENTS AFTER TRANSAORTIC RESECTION OF SUBAORTIC MEMBRANE
    PALATIANOS, GM
    WELCH, EM
    JACOBS, JP
    KAISER, GA
    PERRYMAN, RA
    CHANDAR, JS
    GELBAND, H
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1990, 38 (02): : A336 - A336
  • [32] Results of long-term follow-up after curative resection of Dukes a colorectal cancer
    Matthias W. Wichmann
    Christian Müller
    Hans M. Hornung
    Ulla Lau-Werner
    Friedrich-Wilhelm Schildberg
    World Journal of Surgery, 2002, 26 : 732 - 736
  • [33] Long-term follow-up after surgical resection of primary lung adenocarcinomas (AC)
    Gawrychowski, J
    Brulinski, K
    Malinowski, E
    Papla, B
    Gabriel, A
    Kilka, C
    LUNG CANCER, 2004, 45 : S46 - S47
  • [34] Long-Term Follow-Up of Biological Reconstruction with Free Fibular Graft after Resection of Extremity Diaphyseal Bone Tumors
    Li, Zhaohui
    Pan, Zhen
    Guo, Hua
    Fei, Xiang
    Cheng, Dongdong
    Yang, Qingcheng
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (23)
  • [35] Cystic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Clinicopathologic Study and Long-Term Follow-Up after Surgical Resection in a Single Institution
    Miotto, M.
    Montagnini, G.
    Malpaga, A.
    Impellizzeri, H.
    Posenato, I.
    Capelli, P.
    Butturini, G.
    Landoni, L.
    Bassi, C.
    NEUROENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 103 : 101 - 101
  • [36] Anterior Resection Syndrome and Quality of Life With Long-term Follow-up After Rectal Cancer Resection
    Dilke, Stella M.
    Hadjittofi, Christopher
    Than, Mary
    Tozer, Phil J.
    Stearns, Adam T.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2022, 65 (10) : 1251 - 1263
  • [37] Long-term follow-up of women with borderline ovarian tumors
    Kehoe, S
    Powell, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1996, 53 (02) : 139 - 143
  • [38] Long-term follow-up of bilateral sporadic renal tumors
    Patel, MI
    Simmons, R
    Kattan, MW
    Motzer, RJ
    Reuter, VE
    Russo, P
    UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (05) : 921 - 925
  • [39] LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP AFTER ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY
    ROSCH, W
    RIEMANN, JF
    LUX, G
    LINDNER, HG
    ENDOSCOPY, 1981, 13 (04) : 152 - 153
  • [40] Long-Term Follow-up after Surgery for Exodeviation
    Kordic, H.
    Sturm, V.
    Landau, K.
    KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2009, 226 (04) : 315 - 320