PLATELET BINDING CHARACTERISTICS DISTINGUISH PLACEBO RESPONDERS FROM NONRESPONDERS IN DEPRESSION

被引:11
|
作者
SHELINE, YI
BLACK, KJ
BARDGETT, ME
CSERNANSKY, JG
机构
[1] Washington University School of Medicine in St, Louis Department of Psychiatry, St.Louis, MO, 63110
[2] Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St.Louis, MO, 63110-1093
关键词
DEPRESSION; PLACEBO; SEROTONIN; 5-HT UPTAKE; 5-HT2; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1016/0893-133X(94)00097-J
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
To determine whether there are characteristics distinguishing placebo responders from nonresponders, we studied 37 outpatients meeting DSM-III-X criteria for depression who were enrolled in controlled drug trials and 14 control subjects. Clinical data and blood samples were collected on admission and after a 7- to 10-day placebo washout. All patients experiencing a 40% drop in the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) at the time of the second evaluation were considered placebo responders. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in clinical variables. Platelet markers distinguished the groups: Most notably, placebo nonresponders had the lowest 5-HT uptake site density values, placebo responders had intermediate values, and normal controls had the highest values. Placebo responders and placebo nonresponders had higher 5-HT uptake affinity values. No significant differences were observed among the groups in platelet 5-HT2 receptor site density or affinity values. These results suggest that platelet serotonin characteristics, but Mot common clinical characteristics, may distinguish depressed patients who do and do not respond to placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 322
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Characteristics of fluoxetine vs. placebo responders in a randomized trial of geriatric depression.
    Ackerman, DL
    Greenland, S
    Small, GW
    Bystritsky, A
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 145 (11) : 147 - 147
  • [22] Neural mechanisms mediating the effects of expectation in visceral placebo analgesia: An fMRI study in healthy placebo responders and nonresponders
    Elsenbruch, Sigrid
    Kotsis, Vassilios
    Benson, Sven
    Rosenberger, Christina
    Reidick, Daniel
    Schedlowski, Manfred
    Bingel, Ulrike
    Theysohn, Nina
    Forsting, Michael
    Gizewski, Elke R.
    PAIN, 2012, 153 (02) : 382 - 390
  • [23] CHARACTERISTICS OF BLOOD-PRESSURE RESPONDERS AND NONRESPONDERS TO ORAL CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTATION
    LYLE, RM
    MELBY, CL
    HYNER, GC
    CIRCULATION, 1986, 74 (04) : 34 - 34
  • [24] Clinical and Biomechanical Characteristics of Total Hip Arthroplasty Responders and Nonresponders.
    Waldman, Genna
    Foucher, Kharma C.
    ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2012, 64 (10): : S346 - S347
  • [26] INDOMETHACIN IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - CLINICAL EFFECTS, PHARMACOKINETICS, AND PLATELET STUDIES IN RESPONDERS AND NONRESPONDERS
    BABER, N
    HALLIDAY, LDC
    VANDENHEUVEL, WJA
    WALKER, RW
    SIBEON, R
    KEENAN, JP
    LITTLER, T
    ORME, MLE
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1979, 38 (02) : 128 - 136
  • [27] Abnormal Reward-Pathway Function Distinguishes Responders from Nonresponders to Dorsomedial Prefrontal RTMS for Major Depression
    Downar, Jonathan
    Geraci, Joseph
    Salomons, Tim
    Dunlop, Katharine
    Kennedy, Sidney
    Flint, Alastair
    Giacobbe, Peter
    BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 73 (09) : 207S - 207S
  • [28] What distinguishes responders from nonresponders to a vocational rehabilitation program?
    Vindholmen, Solveig
    Haugen, Tommy
    Hoigaard, Rune
    Seiler, Stephen
    HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (01): : 263 - 280
  • [29] Identifying baseline characteristics of placebo responders versus nonresponders in randomized double-blind trials of refractory partial-onset seizures
    Niklson, I
    Edrich, P
    Verdru, P
    EPILEPTIC DISORDERS, 2006, 8 (01) : 37 - 44
  • [30] A COMPARISON OF SELECTED PERSONALITY-CHARACTERISTICS OF RESPONDERS AND NONRESPONDERS TO A MAILED QUESTIONNAIRE STUDY
    BENNETT, CM
    HILL, RE
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1964, 58 (04): : 178 - 180