The determinants of terrorist shocks' cross-market transmission

被引:13
|
作者
Drakos, Konstantinos [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Accounting & Finance, Athens, Greece
[2] Network Econ Anal Terrorism, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Stock markets; Stock returns; Terrorism;
D O I
10.1108/15265941011025170
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore the determinants of the cross-market transmission mechanism for terrorist shocks, focusing on two major terrorist events and 68 national stock markets. Design/methodology/approach - The paper generates daily abnormal returns from a three-factor world asset-pricing model. Abnormal returns are then regressed on proxies of three transmission mechanisms; a world integration channel, a bilateral integration channel, and a liquidity channel. Findings - The findings indicate that terrorism shocks are diffused cross-nationally in a non-uniform manner. This paper finds empirical support for all three channels when considered separately. The bilateral integration channel contains the highest explanatory power since it is found that a third country's trade linkages with the "ground-zero" country explain about 24 percent of the stock market reaction. A country's share in the world trade, a proxy for the world integration channel, is able to explain about 12 percent of abnormal-return variation, while the liquidity channel exhibits the lowest predictive power, with the value of stock trading explaining about 6 percent. A hybrid model, where proxies for all channels are included, shows that only the bilateral trade linkages with the "ground-zero" country are significant determinants of the stock market reaction. Practical implications - Provides evidence useful for portfolio management and authorities' assessment of terrorist shocks' impact on capital markets. Originality/value - It is the first study that investigates the determinants of cross-market transmission of terrorist shocks.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 163
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Rise Of Cross-Market Hospital Systems And Their Market Power In The US
    Fulton, Brent D.
    Arnold, Daniel R.
    King, Jaime S.
    Montague, Alexandra D.
    Greaney, Thomas L.
    Scheffler, Richard M.
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2022, 41 (11) : 1652 - 1660
  • [22] Speculation, Cross-Market Sentiment and the Predictability of Gold Market Volatility
    Niu, Zibo
    Demirer, Riza
    Suleman, Muhammad Tahir
    Zhang, Hongwei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL FINANCE, 2024, 25 (03) : 278 - 295
  • [23] Software architectures support cross-market fertilization
    Yencharis, L.
    [J]. 2001, Cygnus Publishing Inc. (16)
  • [24] European trading volumes on cross-market holidays
    Batrinca, Bogdan
    Hesse, Christian W.
    Treleaven, Philip C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2018, 23 (04) : 675 - 704
  • [25] Mechanism Design for Cross-Market Task Crowdsourcing
    Qiao, Yu
    Wu, Jun
    Zhang, Lei
    Wang, Chongjun
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE/ACM INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON QUALITY OF SERVICE (IWQOS 2019), 2019,
  • [26] Modeling the determinants of dry bulk FFA trading volume from a cross-market perspective of spot and forward
    Zheng, Shiyuan
    Chen, Shun
    [J]. MARITIME BUSINESS REVIEW, 2018, 3 (03) : 256 - 275
  • [27] Financial contagion in the laboratory: The cross-market rebalancing channel
    Cipriani, Marco
    Gardenal, Gloria
    Guarino, Antonio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (11) : 4310 - 4326
  • [28] CROSS-MARKET IMPACT OF PLATFORMS' ACTIVITIES: A SECONDARY RELEVANT MARKET APPROACH
    Lee, Ki Jong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPETITION LAW & ECONOMICS, 2022, 18 (02) : 483 - 521
  • [29] Analyzing the determinants of terrorist attacks and their market reactions
    Halkos, George
    Managi, Shunsuke
    Zisiadou, Argyro
    [J]. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND POLICY, 2017, 54 : 57 - 73
  • [30] The stock-bond comovements and cross-market trading
    Li, Mengling
    Zheng, Huanhuan
    Chong, Terence Tai Leung
    Zhang, Yang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC DYNAMICS & CONTROL, 2016, 73 : 417 - 438