USE OF CHUCK MUSCLES AND THEIR ACCEPTABILITY IN RESTRUCTURED BEEF SURIMI STEAKS

被引:6
|
作者
RUIZ, CF
HIGGINBOTHAM, DA
CARPENTER, JA
RESURRECCION, AVA
LANIER, TC
机构
[1] UNIV GEORGIA,DEPT FOOD SCI & TECHNOL,ATHENS,GA 30602
[2] N CAROLINA STATE UNIV,DEPT FOOD SCI,RALEIGH,NC 27695
关键词
BEEF; FISH PASTES; CONSUMER SURVEYS; MUSCLES; STEAKS; YIELDS;
D O I
10.2527/1993.71102654x
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Ten major muscles along with any unidentifiable lean, were carefully excised from 16 Choice square-cut chucks Yield Grade 2, and placed according to previously determined tenderness rankings, into one of three muscle groups. Group 1 was composed of the most tender muscles, and contained the infraspinatus, longissimus, and triceps brachii. Group 2 contained intermediate tenderness muscles and was composed of the serratus ventralis, deep pectoral, and complexus. Group 3 contained the least tender muscles and was composed of the biceps brachii, supraspinatus, rhomboideus, trapezius, deltoids, and neck muscles. Each group was restructured into beef/surimi steaks and was evaluated. Total muscle yield before trimming accounted for 66.2% of the chuck. Careful fat trimming, desinewing, and internal seam cutting on individual muscles resulted in 34.7% lean available for the restructuring of steaks. The triceps brachii, longissimus, supraspinatus, and infraspinatus required the least trimming and were easiest to excise. These muscles made up 49% of the trimmed meat and 13.7% of the total chuck. Steaks were evaluated by a consumer sensory panel for tenderness, flavor, overall preference, and intent to purchase. There were no differences detected by consumers among the muscle groups for the sensory traits studied. Tenderness and flavor were rated equal to intact steaks for all muscle groups studied. The consumer sensory panel indicated that Groups 1 and 2 would be purchased twice a month and Group 3 once a month.
引用
收藏
页码:2654 / 2658
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Flavor relationships among muscles from the beef chuck and round
    Meisinger, J. L.
    James, J. M.
    Calkins, C. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2006, 84 (10) : 2826 - 2833
  • [32] INFLUENCE OF HOT AND COLD BONING ON THE PALATABILITY, TEXTURAL AND ECONOMIC TRAITS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS
    SEMAN, DL
    MOODY, WG
    FOX, JD
    GAY, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1987, 52 (04) : 879 - &
  • [33] EFFECTS OF FAT LEVEL AND COOKING METHODS ON PHYSICAL AND SENSORY CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS
    PENFIELD, MP
    COSTELLO, CA
    MCNEIL, MA
    RIEMANN, MJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 1989, 11 (05) : 349 - 356
  • [34] Enhancement of beef chuck and loin muscles with ammonium hydroxide and salt
    Hamling, A. E.
    Calkins, C. R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2008, 86 (04) : 967 - 971
  • [35] THE EFFECT OF SLICE THICKNESS AND MIXING TIME ON THE PALATABILITY AND COOKING CHARACTERISTICS OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS
    NOBLE, BJ
    SEIDEMAN, SC
    QUENZER, NM
    COSTELLO, WJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD QUALITY, 1985, 7 (03) : 201 - 208
  • [36] Fiber-type composition of muscles of the beef chuck and round
    Kirchofer, KS
    Calkins, CR
    Gwartney, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2002, 80 (11) : 2872 - 2878
  • [37] Intramuscular tenderness variation within four muscles of the beef chuck
    Searls, GA
    Maddock, RJ
    Wulf, DM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 83 (12) : 2835 - 2842
  • [38] EFFECTS OF ADDED CONNECTIVE TISSUES ON THE SENSORY AND MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS
    STRANGE, ED
    WHITING, RC
    [J]. MEAT SCIENCE, 1990, 27 (01) : 61 - 74
  • [39] RESTRUCTURED BEEF STEAKS FROM HOT-BONED AND COLD-BONED CARCASSES
    HUFFMAN, DL
    MCCAFFERTY, DM
    CORDRAY, JC
    STANLEY, MH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1984, 49 (01) : 164 - 167
  • [40] Effect of cut type of beef on cooking loss, shear force and palatability of restructured steaks
    Ramirez, JR
    Huerta-Leidenz, N
    Muñoz, B
    Bravo, RR
    Márquez-Salas, E
    [J]. REVISTA CIENTIFICA-FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS VETERINARIAS, 2001, 11 (02): : 109 - 116