POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION FOR TUBERCULOUS KYPHOSIS OF DORSAL AND LUMBAR SPINES

被引:271
|
作者
MOON, MS
WOO, YK
LEE, KS
HA, KY
KIM, SS
SUN, DH
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University Medical College, Kang-Nam St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul
关键词
ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION; KYPHOSIS; POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION; SPINE; TUBERCULOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199509000-00013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Thirty-nine adults and five children with active spinal tuberculosis and resulting kyphosis of the dorsal and lumbar spine who had combined posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion were observed to determine whether the corrected spinal deformity could be maintained until solid fusion. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined two-stage procedure for treating kyphosis due to active spinal tuberculosis. Summary of Background Data. Until 1970, with all methods of treatment, kyphosis due to active spinal tuberculosis tended to increase during therapy. Most of the patients treated with these methods were not happy with this residual kyphosis, even though their disease was arrested or cured. Kyphosis became their main concern regarding further treatment. Methods. A combined two-stage procedure, under the cover of 18 months of triple chemotherapy, was used for all patients. For posterior stabilization, the Harrington distraction system, Rush nails or Steinmann pins and wires, and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation were used. The diagnosis of successful interbody fusion was made if there was no loss of correction, no graft resorption or graft bed resorption, and if there was visible graft remodeling, such as trabeculation between the graft beds and graft and the graft hypertrophy. Results. In the 39 adults, average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up kyphosis angles were 37 degrees, 16 degrees, and 18 degrees, respectively. In four children, the average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up kyphosis angles were 55 degrees, 28 degrees, and 31 degrees, respectively. The loss of correction did not exceed 3 degrees. For one-segment spondylodesis, the average fusion times were 4 months in adults and 3.5 months in children. For a two-segment fusion, the average fusion times were 6 months in adults and 6.3 months in children. Conclusion. Posterior instrumental stabilization and anterior interbody fusion were found helpful in arresting the disease early, providing early fusion, preventing progression of kyphosis, and correcting the kyphosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1910 / 1916
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Surgeon Learning Curve and Clinical Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Posterior Percutaneous Instrumentation
    Mirza, M. Zain
    Olson, Sydney L.
    Panthofer, Annalise M.
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Williams, Seth K.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2022, 6 (12):
  • [32] A novel technique for posterior lumbar interbody fusion to obtain a good local lordosis angle: anterior-release posterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Inoue, Daisuke
    Matsumori, Hiroaki
    Shigematsu, Hideki
    Ueda, Yurito
    Morita, Toshiya
    Kawasaki, Sachiko
    Ikejiri, Masaki
    Tanaka, Yasuhito
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [33] Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Posterior Instrumentation at L5/S1
    Jacob, Kevin C.
    Patel, Madhav R.
    Ribot, Max A.
    Parsons, Alexander W.
    Vanjani, Nisheka N.
    Pawlowski, Hanna
    Prabhu, Michael C.
    Singh, Kern
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 157 : E111 - E122
  • [34] Anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Richter, M.
    Weidenfeld, M.
    Uckmann, F. P.
    ORTHOPADE, 2015, 44 (02): : 154 - 161
  • [35] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Sheng-Dan Jiang
    Jiang-Wei Chen
    Lei-Sheng Jiang
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2012, 132 : 1259 - 1266
  • [36] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    SORENSEN, KH
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 48 (02): : 214 - 214
  • [37] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    LOGUIDICE, VA
    JOHNSON, RG
    GUYER, RD
    STITH, WJ
    OHNMEISS, DD
    HOCHSCHULER, SH
    RASHBAUM, RF
    SPINE, 1988, 13 (03) : 366 - 369
  • [38] ANTERIOR LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION
    VANAKKERVEEKEN, PF
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 64 : 105 - 107
  • [39] Which procedure is better for lumbar interbody fusion: anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion?
    Jiang, Sheng-Dan
    Chen, Jiang-Wei
    Jiang, Lei-Sheng
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2012, 132 (09) : 1259 - 1266
  • [40] Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: A financial analysis
    Whitecloud, TS
    Roesch, WW
    Ricciardi, JE
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS, 2001, 14 (02): : 100 - 103