POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION AND ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION FOR TUBERCULOUS KYPHOSIS OF DORSAL AND LUMBAR SPINES

被引:271
|
作者
MOON, MS
WOO, YK
LEE, KS
HA, KY
KIM, SS
SUN, DH
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Catholic University Medical College, Kang-Nam St. Mary’s Hospital, Seoul
关键词
ANTERIOR INTERBODY FUSION; KYPHOSIS; POSTERIOR INSTRUMENTATION; SPINE; TUBERCULOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199509000-00013
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Thirty-nine adults and five children with active spinal tuberculosis and resulting kyphosis of the dorsal and lumbar spine who had combined posterior instrumentation and anterior interbody fusion were observed to determine whether the corrected spinal deformity could be maintained until solid fusion. Objective. To evaluate the effectiveness of the combined two-stage procedure for treating kyphosis due to active spinal tuberculosis. Summary of Background Data. Until 1970, with all methods of treatment, kyphosis due to active spinal tuberculosis tended to increase during therapy. Most of the patients treated with these methods were not happy with this residual kyphosis, even though their disease was arrested or cured. Kyphosis became their main concern regarding further treatment. Methods. A combined two-stage procedure, under the cover of 18 months of triple chemotherapy, was used for all patients. For posterior stabilization, the Harrington distraction system, Rush nails or Steinmann pins and wires, and Texas Scottish Rite Hospital instrumentation were used. The diagnosis of successful interbody fusion was made if there was no loss of correction, no graft resorption or graft bed resorption, and if there was visible graft remodeling, such as trabeculation between the graft beds and graft and the graft hypertrophy. Results. In the 39 adults, average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up kyphosis angles were 37 degrees, 16 degrees, and 18 degrees, respectively. In four children, the average preoperative, immediate postoperative, and last follow-up kyphosis angles were 55 degrees, 28 degrees, and 31 degrees, respectively. The loss of correction did not exceed 3 degrees. For one-segment spondylodesis, the average fusion times were 4 months in adults and 3.5 months in children. For a two-segment fusion, the average fusion times were 6 months in adults and 6.3 months in children. Conclusion. Posterior instrumental stabilization and anterior interbody fusion were found helpful in arresting the disease early, providing early fusion, preventing progression of kyphosis, and correcting the kyphosis.
引用
收藏
页码:1910 / 1916
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Single stage decompression, anterior interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation for tuberculous kyphosis of the dorso-lumbar spine
    Laheri, VJ
    Badhe, NP
    Dewnany, GT
    SPINAL CORD, 2001, 39 (08) : 429 - 436
  • [2] Single stage decompression, anterior interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation for tuberculous kyphosis of the dorso-lumbar spine
    VJ Laheri
    NP Badhe
    GT Dewnany
    Spinal Cord, 2001, 39 : 429 - 436
  • [3] Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterior instrumentation in the surgical management of lumbar tuberculous spondylitis
    Lee, J. S.
    Moon, K. P.
    Kim, S. J.
    Suh, K. T.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (02): : 210 - 214
  • [4] Surgical Treatment of Lumbar Tuberculous Spondylodiscitis by Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) and Posterior Instrumentation
    Zaveri, Gautam R.
    Mehta, Satyen S.
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2009, 22 (04): : 257 - 262
  • [5] Posterior and anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Madhu, Tiruveedhula S.
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDICS, 2008, 22 (06): : 406 - 413
  • [6] Utility of Postoperative Radiographs After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With or Without Posterior Instrumentation
    Simpson, Andrew K.
    Osler, Polina
    Wood, Kirkham B.
    SPINE, 2013, 38 (23) : 2038 - 2042
  • [7] Comparison of open and minimally invasive techniques for posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion after open anterior lumbar interbody fusion
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Yu, Anthony L.
    Gruskay, Jordan A.
    Delasotta, Lawrence A.
    Radcliff, Kristen E.
    Rihn, Jeffrey A.
    Hilibrand, Alan S.
    Anderson, D. Greg
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 13 (05): : 489 - 497
  • [8] Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study
    Kadam, Abhijeet
    Wigner, Nathan
    Saville, Philip
    Arlet, Vincent
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 27 (06) : 650 - 660
  • [9] Lumbar spinal fusions: A retrospective comparision of combined anterior/posterior fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wu, JA
    Laiwalla, UZ
    Wang, JC
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE MEDICINE, 2006, 54 (01) : S117 - S117
  • [10] Mini-open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Posterior Instrumentation
    Mamuti, Maiwulanjiang
    Fan, Shunwu
    Liu, Junhui
    Shan, Zhi
    Wang, Chongyan
    Li, Shengyun
    Zhao, Fengdong
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (18) : E1104 - E1114