COMPARATIVE AND EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP REGULATION OF BACTERIA

被引:135
|
作者
PACE, ML
COLE, JJ
机构
[1] Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, 12545, New York, Box AB
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF00166807
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The regulation of bacterial community biomass and productivity by resources and predators is a central concern in the study of microbial food webs. Resource or bottom-up regulation refers to the limitation of bacteria by carbon and nutrients derived from allocthonous inputs, primary production, and heterotrophic production. Predatory or top-down regulation refers to the limitation of bacteria below levels supportable by resources alone. Large scale comparative studies demonstrate strong correlations between bacterial productivity and biomass, suggesting significant resource regulation. Comparisons of the abundances of heterotrophic flagellates and bacteria, however, imply that in some cases there may be top-down regulation of bacteria in eutrophic environments. Experimental studies in lakes support the importance of resource regulation and reveal little top-down control from protozoans. Increases in bacterial abundance and production with nutrient enrichment were limited in enclosure experiments with high abundances of the cladoceran, Daphnia. Regulation of bacteria by Daphnia may occur in many lakes seasonally and prevail in some lakes throughout the year where these animals sustain dense populations. In most situations, however, bacteria appear to be limited primarily by resources.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 193
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Comparative Study of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches to Speaker Diarization
    Evans, Nicholas
    Bozonnet, Simon
    Wang, Dong
    Fredouille, Corinne
    Troncy, Raphael
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 20 (02): : 382 - 392
  • [2] Top-down versus bottom-up approaches in proteomics
    Wehr, Tim
    [J]. LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 24 (09) : 1004 - +
  • [3] Sustainability and uncertainty: Bottom-up and top-down approaches
    Jensen, K. Klint
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 6 : 853 - 855
  • [4] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Company Competitiveness
    Kotik, Vitezslav
    Voracek, Jan
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS (IFKAD 2020): KNOWLEDGE IN DIGITAL AGE, 2020, : 100 - 119
  • [5] TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP APPROACHES TO PROJECT SELECTION
    不详
    [J]. RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, 1978, 21 (02): : 22 - 24
  • [6] General modelling approaches: Top-down or bottom-up?
    Worsley, TE
    Harris, RCE
    [J]. NATIONAL TRANSPORT MODELS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS, 2002, : 57 - 60
  • [7] A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches for the preparation of micro/nanosuspensions
    Verma, Sudhir
    Gokhale, Rajeev
    Burgess, Diane J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS, 2009, 380 (1-2) : 216 - 222
  • [8] A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches for the preparation of nanosuspensions of glipizide
    Mahesh, Koneti Venkata
    Singh, Sachin Kumar
    Gulati, Monica
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 256 : 436 - 449
  • [9] Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies
    Foulkes, David
    Domhoff, G. William
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 27 : 168 - 171
  • [10] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Cognitive Approaches in mTBI Rehabilitation
    Vas, A.
    Luedtke, A.
    Ortiz, E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEAD TRAUMA REHABILITATION, 2020, 35 (02) : E244 - E244