A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches for the preparation of micro/nanosuspensions

被引:259
|
作者
Verma, Sudhir [1 ]
Gokhale, Rajeev [2 ]
Burgess, Diane J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Pharmaceut Sci, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
[2] Abbott Labs, Abbott Pk, IL 60064 USA
关键词
Microfluidization; Precipitation; Nanosuspensions; Stabilizers; Solubility; Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance; PHYSICAL STABILITY; DRUG-DELIVERY; NANOSUSPENSIONS; FORMULATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.07.005
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Nano-sizing offers a promising method for the formulation of poorly aqueous soluble compounds. Nanosuspensions can be prepared by top-down or bottom-up approaches. The different conditions encountered in these two approaches can greatly affect nanosuspension characteristics. In this study, milling via microfluidization and precipitation via sonication were compared to study their effects on the formation and stability of ibuprofen nanosuspensions. Various stabilizers (SLS, PVP K-30, Pluronic F-68 and F-127, Tween 80 and different hydroxypropyl methylcelluloses (HPMCs)) were evaluated. Both processes resulted in a similar trend in the initial particle size and comparable short-term physical stability of suspensions. Of all the stabilizers investigated, the HPMCs were the most effective both in terms of particle size reduction and short-term physical stability. Differences in stabilizer efficacy were observed between the two processing methods. The initial particle size of the suspensions prepared using microfluidization correlated with the solubility of ibuprofen in the respective stabilizer solutions. Whereas, the initial particle size of suspensions prepared using precipitation under sonication correlated with the HLB values of the stabilizers. The solubility of ibuprofen in the stabilizer solution also played a significant role in the increase in particle size on storage, indicating Ostwald ripening. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 222
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study of top-down and bottom-up approaches for the preparation of nanosuspensions of glipizide
    Mahesh, Koneti Venkata
    Singh, Sachin Kumar
    Gulati, Monica
    [J]. POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 256 : 436 - 449
  • [2] A Comparative Study of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches to Speaker Diarization
    Evans, Nicholas
    Bozonnet, Simon
    Wang, Dong
    Fredouille, Corinne
    Troncy, Raphael
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO SPEECH AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, 2012, 20 (02): : 382 - 392
  • [3] COMPARATIVE AND EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP REGULATION OF BACTERIA
    PACE, ML
    COLE, JJ
    [J]. MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 1994, 28 (02) : 181 - 193
  • [4] Top-down versus bottom-up approaches in proteomics
    Wehr, Tim
    [J]. LC GC NORTH AMERICA, 2006, 24 (09) : 1004 - +
  • [5] Sustainability and uncertainty: Bottom-up and top-down approaches
    Jensen, K. Klint
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2007, 6 : 853 - 855
  • [6] Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches to Company Competitiveness
    Kotik, Vitezslav
    Voracek, Jan
    [J]. 15TH INTERNATIONAL FORUM ON KNOWLEDGE ASSET DYNAMICS (IFKAD 2020): KNOWLEDGE IN DIGITAL AGE, 2020, : 100 - 119
  • [7] General modelling approaches: Top-down or bottom-up?
    Worsley, TE
    Harris, RCE
    [J]. NATIONAL TRANSPORT MODELS: RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND PROSPECTS, 2002, : 57 - 60
  • [8] TOP-DOWN AND BOTTOM-UP APPROACHES TO PROJECT SELECTION
    不详
    [J]. RESEARCH MANAGEMENT, 1978, 21 (02): : 22 - 24
  • [9] Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies
    Foulkes, David
    Domhoff, G. William
    [J]. CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 27 : 168 - 171
  • [10] Creation of functional micro/nano systems through top-down and bottom-up approaches
    Wong, Tak-Sing
    Brough, Branden
    Ho, Chih-Ming
    [J]. MCB Molecular and Cellular Biomechanics, 2009, 6 (01): : 1 - 55