Use of domestic craft for meaning-making post-disaster

被引:4
|
作者
Maidment, J. [1 ]
Tudor, R. [2 ]
Campbell, A. [2 ]
Whittaker, K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Dept Human Serv & Social Work, Christchurch, New Zealand
[2] Christchurch Inst Technol, Nursing & Human Serv, Christchurch, New Zealand
关键词
craft; disaster; earthquake; New Zealand; post-traumatic growth; resilience;
D O I
10.1080/1177083X.2015.1047457
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Much of the post-disaster research has focused on the vulnerability of affected populations and deleterious effects of such events on mental health, living conditions and employment. Little scholarly consideration has been given to investigating the resourceful activities of everyday living that occupants of disaster-ridden locations use to strengthen coping and aid recovery. This article reports on research conducted after the Christchurch 2010-2011 earthquakes aimed at capturing how people have used crafting as a means of connecting with others and aiding recovery. Using participant voices from five focus group and nine individual interviews, findings from this research show how Cantabrians used the activity of crafting to bring people together, generating a form of healing and recovery. Incorporating symbolism, expressions of compassion and restoring broken materials within their crafting helped participants generate strong and positive responses to a traumatic series of events. The benefits of these crafting efforts were realised on both individual and community levels, signalling the importance of creativity in disaster response work. While reference to domestic crafting has been largely absent from earlier research on disaster recovery we demonstrate how this medium has been powerful in enabling individuals to forge their own recovery after the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 152
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] EXPOSING POST-DISASTER MYTHS
    不详
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGY TODAY, 2006, 22 (01) : 29 - 29
  • [32] Rebuilding lives post-disaster
    Mihai, Anca
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2020, 23 (05) : 911 - 912
  • [33] Exploring Intercultural Interaction: The Use of Semiotic Resources in Meaning-Making Processes
    Abdullah, Nur Nabilah
    Sahar, Rafidah
    [J]. GLOCAL CONFERENCE 2020 IN ASIA (THE CALA 2020): 2020 CONFERENCE ON ASIAN LINGUISTIC ANTHROPOLOGY: ASIAN TEXT, GLOBAL CONTEXT, 2020, : 329 - 333
  • [34] THE URBANSCAPE DUALITY DURING A DISASTER AND POST-DISASTER
    Omicevic, Nerma
    Scitaroci, Bojana Bojanic Obad
    [J]. PROSTOR, 2018, 26 (01): : 106 - 115
  • [35] Introduction - Meaning-making in social movements
    Kurzman, Charles
    [J]. ANTHROPOLOGICAL QUARTERLY, 2008, 81 (01) : 5 - 15
  • [36] Emptiness and Work: a Meaning-Making Perspective
    Bendassolli, Pedro F.
    [J]. INTEGRATIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 2017, 51 (04) : 598 - 617
  • [37] Attachment and meaning-making in perinatal bereavement
    Uren, TH
    Wastell, CA
    [J]. DEATH STUDIES, 2002, 26 (04) : 279 - 308
  • [38] Backchannel Persistence and Collaborative Meaning-Making
    McNely, Brian J.
    [J]. SIGDOC'09: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DESIGN OF COMMUNICATION, 2009, : 297 - 303
  • [39] Meaning-making and creativity in musical entrainment
    Schiavio, Andrea
    Witek, Maria A. G.
    Stupacher, Jan
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [40] A note on life as meaning-making machinery
    Neuman, Y
    [J]. SEMIOTICA, 2006, 158 (1-4) : 357 - 364