INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY AND ANTEROGRADE COMMON BILE-DUCT EXPLORATION IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - TECHNIQUE, RESULTS, PERSPECTIVES

被引:0
|
作者
NEUFANG, T
LUDTKE, FE
BARTKOWSKI, R
BRUGGEMANN, A
LEPSIEN, G
机构
来源
ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE | 1994年 / 119卷 / 06期
关键词
LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT STONES; INTRAOPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY; TRANSCYSTIC COMMON BILE DUCT EXPLORATION; LITHOTRIPSY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The avoidance of (unrecognized) bile duct injuries (1) and the management of bile duct stones (pre-, intra- or postoperatively?) (2) are believed to be the main problems in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCE) at present. They must be a challenge for surgery to develop and improve the concepts of minimally invasive therapy for treatment of cholelithiasis. Intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) plays a very important role and is the basis of innovative, laparoscopically assisted procedures (3) for single session therapy of gallbladder and bile duct stones. (1) A detailed analysis of the literature proves the value of IOC for avoidance or early recognition of iatrogenic bile duct injuries. IOC is of most importance to compensate fundamental restrictions of the laparoscopic technique (missing possibility for palpation or anterograde preparation). IOC adds additional safety to the laparoscopic procedure and detects unsuspected bile duct stones. (2) At present, surgical management of cholecysto-/choledocholithiasis is splitted in two independent procedures: LCE and pre- or postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) with optional endoscopic papillotomy (EPT). A critical analysis of the literature and of the results of 623 LCE performed between 10/91 and 9/93 in the own institution leads to the following conclusions: Preoperative ERCs are performed unnecessary in about 50% of cases. They could be avoided by routine use of IOC. The combination of two independent procedures (LCE and ERC/PT) for treatment of cholelithiasis increases mortality and morbidity. Thus, the outcome of therapeutic splitting'' is not clearly superior to conventional treatment by open surgery. The inconvenience for our patients caused by the operation itself and one or more additional endoscopic procedures disagrees with the principles of minimally invasive therapy and raises the overall costs and the duration of treatment. (3) The transcystic anterograde access to common bile duct exploration (CBDE) is recommended as an alternative for the concept of ,,therapeutic splitting''. If CBD-stones are suspected or present, IOC with optional transcystic common bile duct exploration allows final diagnosis and treatment in a single session. Additional risks and costs caused by choledochotomy as well as by pre- or postoperative endoscopic retrograde procedures (ERC, EFT) are avoided. Techniques and equipment of IOC and transcystic common bile duct exploration are presented in detail. Of 22 transcystic common bile duct explorations 20 were performed without complications. Two cases required conversion to open surgery. The use of pulsed dye laser or electro-hydraulic lithotripsy under direct endoscopic control is recommended for treatment of large and impacted stones. Randomized studies for further evaluation of the different therapeutic modalities are urgently required.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 414
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] LAPAROSCOPIC EXPLORATION OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT
    HELMS, B
    CZARNETZKI, HD
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 1993, 118 (06): : 329 - 336
  • [22] CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITH CONCOMITANT EXPLORATION OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT
    FRAZEE, RC
    VANHEERDEN, JA
    SURGERY GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 1989, 168 (06): : 513 - 516
  • [23] LESIONS OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT IN LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    FUGGER, R
    KLIMANN, S
    WALTER, RM
    GNANT, M
    GOTZINGER, P
    HERBST, F
    SCHULZ, F
    FRITSCH, A
    HELVETICA CHIRURGICA ACTA, 1993, 59 (04) : 571 - 575
  • [24] LESIONS OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT AT LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    SIEWERT, JR
    UNGEHEUER, A
    FEUSSNER, H
    CHIRURG, 1994, 65 (09): : 748 - 757
  • [25] LAPAROSCOPIC SUTURE TECHNIQUE AFTER COMMON BILE-DUCT EXPLORATION
    LEZOCHE, E
    PAGANINI, A
    FELICIOTTI, F
    CHAN, R
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY & ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 3 (03) : 209 - 212
  • [26] IMAGING OF THE COMMON BILE-DUCT DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - SONOGRAPHY VERSUS VIDEOFLUOROSCOPIC CHOLANGIOGRAPHY
    TEEFEY, SA
    SOPER, NJ
    MIDDLETON, WD
    BALFE, DM
    BRINK, JA
    STRASBERG, SM
    CALLERY, M
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (04) : 847 - 851
  • [27] INTRAOPERATIVE ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES DURING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    DESLANDRES, E
    GAGNER, M
    POMP, A
    RHEAULT, M
    LEDUC, R
    CLERMONT, R
    GRATTON, J
    BERNARD, EJ
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1993, 39 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [28] Intraoperative cholangiography and bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy - Reply
    Buanes, T
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY-ULTRASOUND AND INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2000, 14 (01): : 95 - 95
  • [29] THE EVOLVING ROLE OF ERCP AND LAPAROSCOPIC COMMON BILE-DUCT EXPLORATION IN THE ERA OF LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY
    ARREGUI, ME
    NAVARRETE, JL
    DAVIS, CJ
    HAMMOND, JC
    BARTEAU, J
    INTERNATIONAL SURGERY, 1994, 79 (03) : 188 - 194
  • [30] CHOLECYSTECTOMY WITHOUT OPERATIVE CHOLANGIOGRAPHY - IMPLICATIONS FOR COMMON BILE-DUCT INJURY AND RETAINED COMMON BILE-DUCT STONES
    BARKUN, JS
    FRIED, GM
    BARKUN, AN
    SIGMAN, HH
    HINCHEY, EJ
    GARZON, J
    WEXLER, MJ
    MEAKINS, JL
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1993, 218 (03) : 371 - 379